Greatest Cover-Up of All Time

| Print |

Written by David Wilcock Friday, 13 January 2012 13:13

A 122-nation alliance is backing a lawsuit that could free the Earth from financial tyranny.
This investigation reveals who the perpetrators are and what we can do to solve the problem.
[PLEASE NOTE: This article will be undergoing dynamic updates throughout the weekend.
Please LINK to it but do not COPY and MIRROR it until Monday. I highly recommend
reloading every 15 minutes to catch small but relevant updates.]
2012 has begun as a year of rampant paranoia and hopelessness on the Internet and
throughout mainstream media.
The economy appears to be in a dire predicament — ready to go over a cliff into an abyss few
can even allow themselves to consider.
The Euro has been teetering on the brink of total collapse. A frantic bailout of the entire
European Union, proposed by the Federal Reserve, has done very little to relieve the fears of the
showing how tense and uncertain the situation really is.
Simultaneously, very aggressive and blatant moves are being made to start World War III in the Middle East — with imminent, ever-increasing threats from Israel and the United States to attack Iran.
Since 9/11, Americans and much of the Western world have been led to believe that the biggest enemy they face is terrorism from Islamic extremists. Nonetheless, there is now overwhelming, undeniable evidence that the true enemy… is within.
You are about to read a comprehensive investigation summarizing all the best information I have gathered about the true nature of this crisis since I became directly aware of it in 1992.
Very few people are aware that a massive 122-nation coalition has formed to solve the problem — just in the nick of time – and they are backing a legal, public solution to end Financial Tyranny.
A trillion-dollar lawsuit was filed as of November 23, 2011 — and the resulting investigation will provide a rock-solid legal framework to reveal the full nature of the problems we face… and arrest those responsible:
Bear in mind that the evidence backing this lawsuit, if made public, will completely expose what has been going on at the highest levels — by the people themselves, speaking in their own words.
This would be the most dramatic public expose’ of the group responsible for this Financial Tyranny since the early 1800s — as you will see.
Our initial announcement and confirmation of this lawsuit has already received over 650,000 hits, 34,000 Facebook Likes and 1000 written comments as we publish this final, completed investigation.

This initial announcement also earned me a very serious warning — from two different insiders working at high levels of government — that I needed to publish the entire investigation as quickly as possible, or my life could be in imminent danger.
The conspirators are desperate to stop the bleeding and save themselves from prosecution. Threats, bribery, blackmail, torture and murder are their standard tools of the trade.
As you will see, on December 31st, David Hutlzer publicly conveyed vital information to me for this case, acting directly on behalf of Benjamin Fulford — the former Asia-Pacific bureau chief for Forbes Magazine, and a leading representative of this international alliance.
Ben had David direct me to the “Unwanted Publicity Intelligence” website, which contains extremely sensitive documents. I was astonished when I reviewed this website, considering that I was told it is very dangerous to publish pictures of the Federal Reserve bonds.
A week later, on January 6th, David and his eight-year-old son Mackie burned to death in their home. Hardly anything recognizable was left. Accelerants were found outside and arson has not been ruled out.
Is this a coincidence? Maybe. Out of fear, skeptics will insist there is no connection between these two events. I disagree.
Even in light of this blatant threat, I will not be intimidated. This potential murder of a father and son only inspired me to do an even better job with the investigation.
You deserve to know the truth.
Our future depends on it.
Up until now, the only mainstream media outlet that has dared to report on this intriguingly vast and mysterious case is the Courthouse News Service:
The “back story” behind this lawsuit is extremely complex. Since November 23rd, 2011, I have worked an average of 14 or more hours a day to produce this report.
Furthermore, the core information pertaining to the case itself is cloaked in the deepest secrecy. Much of it must be obtained firsthand — from people who have to risk their lives to tell the truth.
Wherever possible, I have drawn off of provable information. When this was unavailable, I relied as much as possible on “leaked” insider testimony that is already well-established on public record to reveal the story. The works of David Guyatt — at — have been uniquely beneficial in this regard.
In addition to the above investigative methods, you will also read the world’s first exclusive, detailed interview with the two main plaintiffs responsible for filing this lawsuit — explaining what they are doing and why it is so urgently needed.
First, however, we need to break down the lies and reveal the full scope of the problem – relying upon provable facts, documented in the public domain, as much as possible.
Since 1913, the currency of the United States has been owned and managed by a private corporation of international bankers known as the “Federal Reserve System.”
This group prints “Federal Reserve Notes” and loans them out to the United States Treasury. American taxpayers then pay interest to the Federal Reserve banking families for the rights to use their money.
The Federal Reserve banking families can therefore print as much money as they want — and give it to whomever they want, secretly, with no oversight or input from the United States government.
In this clip, former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan admits that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency whose decisions cannot be overruled by any element of the legitimate United States government.
“REPORTER: What is the proper relationship… what should be the proper relationship between a chairman of the Fed and a president of the United States?
GREENSPAN: Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency. And that means basically that, uh, there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. 
So long as that is in place, and there is no evidence that the administration, the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don’t frankly matter.
I’ve had very good relationships with presidents.”
Twenty. Six. TRILLION. Dollars.
Here is a small part of the letter where Congressman Alan Grayson spells it all out to John Hively, “The World’s Most Accurate Economic Forecaster Since 1989”.
CONGRESSMAN GRAYSON: I wouldn’t want anyone to think that I’m dramatizing or amplifying what this GAO report says, so I’m just going to list some of my favorite parts, by page number.
Page 131 – The total lending for the Fed’s “broad-based emergency programs” was $16,115,000,000,000. That’s right, more than $16 trillion. The four largest recipients, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America, received more than a trillion dollars each.
The 5th largest recipient was Barclays PLC. The 8th was the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC. The 9th was Deutsche Bank AG. The 10th was UBS AG. These four institutions each got between a quarter of a trillion and a trillion dollars. None of them is an American bank.
Page 205 – Separate and apart from these “broad-based emergency program” loans were another $10,057,000,000,000 in “currency swaps.” In the “currency swaps,” the Fed handed dollars to foreign central banks, no strings attached, to fund bailouts in other countries….
These currency swaps and the “broad-based emergency program” loans, together, totaled more than $26 trillion. That’s almost $100,000 for every man, woman, and child in America.
That’s an amount equal to more than seven years of federal spending — on the military, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on the debt, and everything else. And around twice America’s total GNP….
If the Fed had extended $26 trillion in credit to the American people instead of Wall Street, would there be 24 million Americans today who can’t find a full-time job?
Does this upset you? Or have you become so numb that you just want to click away and look at hot models – or read about celebrities? “I don’t want to hear this $#!+. My life is bad enough as it is.”
26 Trillion is a gigantic number. Seemingly unimaginable.
This is a documented, proven fact. Isn’t it strange that you’ve hardly heard anything about this in the mainstream media?
That should be your first clue. Knowledge is power. Instead of feeling sick, angry, paranoid, sad or depressed, be aware that once you know the truth, nothing can stop us.
There will be losses. David and Mackie Hutlzer may be two of the most recent ones. However, once a “critical mass” of people possess sensitive information, there is simply no possible way to stop it from spreading.
Most people can’t even comprehend such a vast amount of money as 26 Trillion dollars in practical terms – but we’ll get to that.
At first, the most obvious number that jumped out from the report was “only” 16 trillion. You have to add in the ten trillion in “currency swaps” to reach the full 26-trillion-dollar mark.
Let’s stick with the initial figure of 16 trillion for now, as there are very few articles on this subject – and most of them quote that number.
This next article from clearly reveals the scope of the outrage:
The results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve’s nearly 100-year history were posted on Senator Sanders’ webpage earlier this morning:
What was revealed in the audit was startling: $16,000,000,000,000.00 had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations, and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland.
From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve secretly bailed out many of the world’s banks, corporations, and governments.
The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned — and it was loaned out at 0% interest.
Why the Federal Reserve had never been public about this or even informed the United States Congress about the $16 trillion dollar bailout is obvious.
The American public would have been outraged to find out that the Federal Reserve bailed out foreign banks while Americans were struggling to find jobs.
So how much could this figure of 16 trillion dollars have done if it were redirected into the United States economy, on behalf of the people — rather than rewarding the banks and financial institutions who started all this mess in the first place?
Let’s continue with the article from and find out:
To place $16 trillion into perspective, remember that the GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion.
The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is “only” $14.5 trillion.
The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is “only” $3.5 trillion.
Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world.
In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed — and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie — considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received 814 billion dollars.
As it turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion.
The initial figure of 16 trillion that jumped out of the Federal Reserve audit is more money than all the goods and services produced by every single person in the United States — for any given year.
It is greater than the entire amount of debt ever racked up by the United States in its 235-year history as well.
The 2010 Census estimated there are 114,825,428 households in the US. Sixteen trillion dollars in secret bailouts adds up to 139 thousand and 342 dollars per household.
The full figure of 26 trillion adds up to nearly a quarter million dollars per household – $226,430.68 to be exact.
When you put it in those terms, the full weight of the theft becomes nothing short of staggering.
Imagine if your family had a quarter million dollars saved — and then someone robbed you. What if the thief then told everyone what he did – but no one cared enough to do anything?
That’s what just happened to every single family in the United States of America.
Every single adult in the United States who was unemployed or on public assistance could have been given a job – so they can lead a happy, fulfilling and prosperous life – with plenty of money to spare.
A vast public works program could easily have been created to stimulate the economy – so that the money would become an investment, not a one-time gift.
We could have built high-speed bullet trains to make it easier and faster than flying to travel through congested urban areas — such as the East Coast megalopolis — and other corridors between nearby cities.
We could have restored our archaic, battered fleet of passenger airliners, (which still have ashtrays in the bathrooms,) with all new jets – and bigger, more comfortable seats. (Many flights are delayed or canceled for maintenance. This is a consistent problem when I fly.)
We could have restored our crumbling roads and bridges – increasing comfort, safety and gas mileage.
We could have transformed the inner cities with massive construction and refurbishing projects, and dramatically improved public transportation – making it easier for people to work.
We could have massively upgraded the nation’s fiber-optic capabilities – bringing our Internet access up to speed with most of the rest of the developed world.
We could have completely modernized public schools with enough computers for every kid.
We could have trained or hired teachers to educate our children in the skills and software needed to be competitive in today’s evolving workforce – including touch typing, word processing, spreadsheet, Photoshop, web design, video editing, motion graphics, computer animation and music sequencing.
We could have noticed the enormous popularity of Guitar Hero and RockBand and built sound-proofed music studios in schools, where kids earn lessons and studio time on real musical instruments as an incentive for good grades. If they sign a record deal, a figure such as 25 percent of their advance would be paid back to help finance the school.
We could have boldly invested in clean energy technologies to heal the environment – as China is now doing, to the tune of half a trillion dollars.
And, as Foster Gamble revealed in his groundbreaking independent film Thrive, we could have ended poverty and environmental destruction for as little as 200 billion dollars a year.
Instead of doing any of this, the “one percent” continued to live the lifestyles of the rich and famous — while the poor sank ever deeper into the Next Great Depression,  as economist Paul Krugman recently called it.
In early November, Congressman Bernie Sanders revealed that in addition to handing out 16 trillion dollars, (not counting the ten trillion in “currency swaps” Congressman Grayson pointed out), the Federal Reserve also owns the financial agencies they are supposed to be regulating:
The GAO [audit] also revealed that many of the people who serve as directors of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks come from the exact same financial institutions that the Fed is in charge of regulating.
Further, the GAO found that at least 18 current and former Fed board members were affiliated with banks and companies that received emergency loans from the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis.
In other words, the people “regulating” the banks were the exact same people who were being “regulated.” Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse!…
For example, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase served on the New York Fed’s board of directors at the same time that his bank received more than $390 billion in financial assistance from the Fed….
Getting this type of disclosure was not easy. Wall Street and the Federal Reserve fought it every step of the way.
But, as difficult as it was to lift the veil of secrecy at the Fed, it will be even harder to reform the Fed so that it serves the needs of all Americans, and not just Wall Street. But, that is exactly what we have to do.


So far, we’ve seen that the Federal Reserve secretly created 26 trillion dollars, without US government approval. This adds up to nearly a quarter million dollars per household in America.
This money was then handed out to financial institutions like Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank.
While I was conducting this investigation in mid-December, it felt very surreal to see mainstream media authors say the entire bailout added up to nothing more than 1.2 trillion dollars. Then they tried to say “this is what a central bank is supposed to do.”
Add up the emergency loans the Federal Reserve distributed to banks between 2007 and 2009 — when the American economy lurched closer to collapse than anyone had previously thought possible — and it’s an impressive picture.
On Friday, Bloomberg News made available the fullest version yet of its data on Fed emergency lending, a subject the news organization has written about numerous times in the past year. The Bloomberg release includes records of about 50,000 transactions the Fed made through seven different financial mechanisms.
At their peak, these seven programs represented $1.2 trillion in loans to banks and financial institutions — the high-water mark of a massive, systemic bailout whose details the country’s central banking authority has not always seemed eager to divulge….
Even as critics have accused the Fed of being less than forthcoming, few people claim that the central bank did the wrong thing by stepping in to backstop a financial system that seemed to be on the verge of imploding.
“In the middle of the financial crisis, this is what you need. This is what a central bank is supposed to do,” said James Wilcox, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.
Wilcox compared the financial crisis to a forest fire — except, he said, “forest fires are more predictable in the path they’re going to take.”
The Huffington Post featured the genuine figures earlier, as we just saw — which made this all the stranger.
The utterly fake figures of 1.2 trillion and 7.7 trillion were both refuted on December 13th, 2011 by economist L. Randall Wray, who said the actual number is a full-on 29 Trillion dollars.
The true total of Federal Reserve emergency lending to Wall Street is not $1.2 trillion, as Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke contends, nor the $7.7 trillion figure reported by Bloomberg News, which Bernanke publicly contests.The real number, argues economist L. Randall Wray, is a staggering $29 trillion.Wray writes that Bernanke’s recent defense of the lower figure is “misleading” and that the chairman’s claim that Fed bailouts do not constitute a form of spending is plain wrong.
There is simply no justifiable explanation for why this much money was needed. It had nothing to do with securing the assets of ordinary Americans, as we will see.
However, let’s ask this question first: Was this enough money to rescue these institutions and restore them to full health? Or, did it merely keep them on life support a little longer?
The answer is shocking. The 26 trillion dollars was nothing more than a sudden gasp of air for companies that are still drowning in debt.
Thanks to deregulation, such as the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act, these institutions were allowed to hold one dollar in the bank, but then spend like they had 5, 10, 30 or even 100 dollars.
To put it in perspective, if you had ten thousand dollars in your checking account, you would suddenly become a millionaire if you could leverage it at the “100X” point in one single “trade”.
These financial institutions have manipulated and abused this system to do casino gambling, on a global scale — to the tune of hundreds of trillions of dollars.
It’s a very complex discussion, but when you see the term “derivatives”, this is what it means.
Incredibly, just four financial institutions have gambled 600 trillion dollars’ worth of money they don’t even have – so this bailout was still not even close to being enough to protect them.
Even if they had all the money in the world at their disposal, they’d still need ten times more to bail themselves out:
In 2009, five banks held 80% of derivatives in America. Now, just four banks hold a staggering 95.9% of U.S. derivatives, according to a recent report from the Office of the Currency Comptroller.The four banks in question: JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS).Derivatives played a crucial role in bringing down the global economy [in 2008], so you would think that the world’s top policymakers would have reined these things in by now — but they haven’t.
Instead of attacking the problem, regulators have let it spiral out of control, and the result is a $600 trillion time bomb called the derivatives market….
The world’s gross domestic product (GDP) is only about $65 trillion, or roughly 10.83% of the worldwide value of the global derivatives market, according to The Economist.
So there is literally not enough money on the planet to backstop the banks trading these things if they run into trouble.
I personally do not think it is a bad thing to let these companies fail. I fight back with facts – and think for myself instead.
The real money of ordinary people holding accounts in those banks could have been protected for much less than the cost of even the first public TARP bailout.
Just to prove the point, let’s go to and get some provable statistics:
The average American household income was 50,000 dollars in 2010. The overall tax rate is 19 percent, leaving $40,500 in disposable income.
Overall, Americans spend an incredible 94 percent of their disposable income. The remaining 6 percent is saved in the bank.
This adds up to a mere $2,400 dollars per household. This is not a guess, but a provable statistic.
With 114,825,428 households in the US, it would only take one payment of 275 billion, 581 million dollars to guarantee the savings of all American citizens.
The Fed’s secret bailout of 26 trillion dollars was nearly 100 times greater than that.
Obviously the money being held in the stock market is a lot more than 275 billion dollars – but how much is there, exactly?
We know this figure. All you have to do is add up the value of all the companies on the New York Stock Exchange.
This is called “total market capitalization” or the “Total Market Index.” As of this writing, it is just over 13 trillion dollars:
As of today (12/24/11), the Total Market Index is at $ 13,197.2 billion, which is about 88% of the last reported GDP.
This means that even if every single company in the world were to completely stop doing business — abandoning their offices, factories, equipment and services – we could still guarantee every stock on Earth for half the cost of the $26 trillion dollars in interest-free ‘bailout’ loans handed out by the Fed.
Obviously, the offices, factories, equipment, inventory and 95% of the employees could still be used after breaking up these monopolies and arresting the top conspirators. Without the toxic profit losses due to such incredible theft, these companies would probably thrive like never before.
The idea that any company’s entire value to its shareholders would simply disappear in the face of a breakup is completely illogical. Stocks always go down and up, down and up. That’s what they do. People will always need things. There will always be buying and selling.
Again, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation that prints money for the United States. The US then pays interest for the rights to use these “Federal Reserve Notes.”
The Federal Reserve secretly handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailout money between 2007 and 2010. The top four bailed-out banks are now doing 95.9 percent of all the gambling. Their total risk adds up to 600 trillion dollars – ten times more than all the money in the world.
At this point, it may seem that all we have to do is dismantle the Federal Reserve, let the US Treasury print its own money, back up everyone’s bank accounts for 275 billion dollars, and then allow a handful of “too big to fail” financial institutions to collapse — and be restructured in smaller pieces.
However, we now have scientific proof that this problem goes much deeper than just the Federal Reserve and a few of their closest banking buddies.
Instead, the Federal Reserve appears to be at the epicenter of a vast “interlocking directorate” of companies that may earn up to 80 percent of all the world’s wealth.
This, of course, makes it a lot more complicated to clean things up – but I do still believe it can be done, or else I wouldn’t have conducted this investigation.
Ever since Benoit Mandelbrot discovered “fractals” in the 1970s, the fascinating new science of Chaos Theory has become a part of our collective knowledge base.
Mandelbrot discovered a remarkable “geometry of nature” – in which highly complex systems can be reduced down to a few very simple ingredients.
What if we use this same science to “hack” the world’s economy with super-computers – and see how many corporations actually control it?
Three scientists from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, led by James Glattfelder, recently did this – and their results were published in New Scientist, a respected science magazine.
Glattfelder’s team unleashed this armada of supercomputers on Orbis 2007 — a very elaborate database of the top 37 million corporations and individual investors worldwide.
The results were absolutely stunning.
The Swiss scientists quickly found a total of 43,060 trans-national corporations in the Orbis 2007 database.
From this group, Glattfelder’s team revealed that a ‘core’ of 1,318 companies directly controlled 20 percent of the world’s wealth.
However, these corporations also appeared to own and control the stock in a majority of the world’s largest companies — whose profits added up to an additional 60 percent of global revenues:
Although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1318 [corporations] appeared to collectively own, through their shares, the majority of the world’s large blue chip and manufacturing firms — the “real” economy — representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues….
[This] core of 1318 companies [had] interlocking ownerships. Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20 [other corporations].
If that isn’t surprising enough for you, then how about this?
Glattfelder’s team then crunched the numbers even harder – and found a very deeply hidden “super-entity” of only 147 corporations – and “much of it” was connected to the 1,318-company ‘core’.
These 147 companies were all interconnected with each other in an “even more tightly knit” pattern than the 1,318 corporations in the ‘core’. To put it simply, they all owned each other’s companies.
[Specifically, each company within the “super-entity” owned shares in all 146 others.]
Together, this super-elite, good-old-boys-club of 147 companies directly earns a whopping 40 percent of all the wealth in the world:
When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a “super-entity” of 147 even more tightly knit companies — all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity — that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network.
Without the advanced technology of supercomputers and chaos theory, no one would have been able to discover this. History has caught up to the Powers that Were.
Next question: What kind of companies do you think these top 147 corporations are? Remember – they control a staggering 40 percent of the world’s wealth.
As it says on page 6 of the paper, 75 percent of the corporations within the “super-entity” were financial institutions.
The top 20 financial institutions within the “super-entity” should sound pretty familiar to you by now.
They include Barclays Bank, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Merrill Lynch, UBS, Bank of New York, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs.
To be fair, these scientists did say this could all be due to the magic of Chaos theory.
They said this could all be a “logical phase” of the “self-organizing” nature of complex systems – such as the global economy:
“Such structures are common in nature,” says Sugihara…. Or as Braha puts it: “The Occupy Wall Street claim that 1 per cent of people have most of the wealth reflects a logical phase of the self-organising economy.”
So, the super-entity may not result from conspiracy. The real question, says the Zurich team, is whether it can exert concerted political power.
Driffill feels 147 is too many to sustain collusion. Braha suspects they will compete in the market but act together on common interests….
“It’s disconcerting to see how connected things really are,” agrees George Sugihara of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, a complex systems expert who has advised Deutsche Bank.
You never waste words when you write up a scientific paper after years’ worth of hard work. Bearing that in mind, read the last paragraph of the actual paper itself:
This is the first time a ranking of economic actors by global control is presented. Notice that many actors belong to the financial sector… and many of the names are well-known global players….
This means that they do not carry out their business in isolation but, on the contrary, they are tied together in an extremely entangled web of control.
This finding is extremely important since there was no prior economic theory or empirical evidence regarding whether and how top players are connected.
Finally, it should be noted that governments and natural persons are only featured further down in the list.
Then add this line in from the second-to-last paragraph of the first part of the paper, on page 8:
Our results show that, globally, top holders are at least in the position to exert considerable control, either formally (e.g., voting in shareholder and board meetings) or via informal negotiations.
“Informal negotiations” would be one way to describe the Federal Reserve System secretly handing 26 trillion dollars to the “top holders” within the “super-entity” of 147 corporations.
Remember what we learned from Congressman Bernie Sanders after they audited the Federal Reserve?
The directors and board members of the 12 Federal Reserve banks are also running the top financial institutions. They just printed 26 trillion dollars of American money and gave it to themselves.
There’s nothing “natural” about this at all.
Our next task is to “follow the money” – and see if we can find out what corporations and industries are owned, either publicly or in secret, by the Federal Reserve “super-entity”. (Glattfelder’s team has not yet published the full list.)
It’s not that hard to do. If 80 percent of all the world’s profits are going to the Federal Reserve “super-entity”, then they would need to control many of the most profitable industries.
As Glattfelder’s team already said, this entity controls “the majority of the world’s large blue chip and manufacturing firms.”
In case you are unfamiliar with the term “blue chip,” it refers to any large company that consistently draws profits. The Dow Jones Industrial Average tracks the top 30 “blue chip” companies.
I was able to find a Fortune 500 listing of the most profitable industries, by percentage, for 2008 – but nothing more recent. (If you can find it, let me know.)
This list only applies to American companies, but it is still very relevant. Here’s how it looks:
The Number One industry on the list is Network and Other Communications Equipment, earning a 20.4 percent profit margin. Number Two on the list is Internet Services and Retailing, at 19.4 percent.
Financial Data Services do not appear until sixth place – at 11.7 percent.
Pharmaceuticals squeak into third place at a 19.3 percent margin. However, this is misleading – because the overall healthcare / pharmaceutical industry is broken up into fully seven different categories:
Pharmaceuticals – 19.3%. Medical Products and Equipment – 16.3%. Insurance: Life, Health (stock) – 4.6%. Health Care: Pharmacy and Other Services – 3.0%. Health Care: Medical Facilities – 2.4%. Health Care: Insurance and Managed Care – 2.2%. Wholesalers: Health Care – 1.3%.
There are only 43 industries on the Fortune 500 list that actually generated profits – and seven of them are healthcare.
Healthcare therefore accounts for 16.28% of all the money-making industries on the Fortune 500 list. Nothing else captures that many different categories.
The second most-profitable American industry, based on the number of categories it has on the list and how high of a percentage they make, is the petroleum and energy business – which controls six out of 43 spots:
Mining, Crude Oil production – 11.5 percent. Oil and Gas Equipment, Services – 10.2 percent. Utilities: Gas and Electric – 8.7 percent. Petroleum Refining –2.1 percent. Pipelines – 1.5 percent. Energy – 0.9 percent.
The oil companies therefore enjoyed 13.95% of all the most profitable categories of American businesses in 2008.
Together, oil and pharmaceuticals occupy 13 out of 43 slots on the Fortune 500 list of the most profitable American industries – or a stunning 30.23 percent of all the money there is to be made.
Remember – the above figures only tell us how strong of a profit each of these industries is making. If you invested in an industry that was making 20 percent profit per year, you’d be very happy.
This doesn’t actually tell us how much money they are pulling in. If you had a company that cost ten dollars to run, and you made twelve dollars a year, you’d still be making a 20 percent profit.
In order to figure out how much actual money is being made, you have to look at individual businesses.
Here is a link to the Fortune 500 list of the 50 most profitable American businesses in 2010:
The single most profitable American corporation in 2010 was Exxon Mobil — earning 30 billion, 460 million dollars.
Chevron comes in behind AT&T to take third place at 19 billion, 24 million dollars.
ConocoPhillips was #16 at 11 billion, 358 million. Devon Energy and Occidental Petroleum both made 4.5 billion.
Add it all together and you get 69 billion, 842 million dollars in oil profits for 2010 alone – basically 70 billion – and that’s only the oil companies in America’s top 50.
The Fortune 500 list only applies to American industries.
You have to go international to include the non-American “supermajor” oil companies – namely BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Total S.A – each of which are also very substantial – in addition to the American-based Chevron, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips.
The full international list with all these companies included is called the Forbes Global 2000. This gives us a better overall sense of what’s going on in the world – but it still only tracks companies that have to publicly report their earnings.
Eight out of the top 20 largest international companies are banks: JP Morgan Chase, HSBC (UK), ICBC (China), Citigroup, BNP Paribas (France), Wells Fargo, Banco Santander (Spain) and China Construction Bank. That’s a total of 40 percent.
Seven of the top 20 public international companies are oil and gas: Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Petro China, Petrobras, Gazprom, Chevron and Total. That’s 35 percent.
So, fifteen out of the top 20 companies on the Forbes 2000 list – seventy-five percent – are either banking or oil. That leaves only five slots left in the top 20.
Let’s also not forget that the Forbes 2000 list only applies to publicly-traded companies.
Let’s go back to the Fortune 500 list of the top American corporations for a minute.
Fully nine out of the top 50 most profitable Fortune 500 companies in 2010 were pharmaceuticals – and they add up to a total of 64 billion, 924.6 million dollars in profits.
These are only the most obvious, verifiable pharmaceutical / healthcare companies on the list, and only those that appear in the top 50 of the Fortune 500 list:
Johnson and Johnson weighs in at ninth place with 13 billion, 334 million. 10th place is Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway, with 12 billion, 967 million. Then, Procter & Gamble comes in right behind them for 12th place at 12 billion, 736 million.
Pfizer shows up at number 21 with 8 billion, 257 million. Eli Lilly is in 29th place with 5 billion, 69.5 million.
UnitedHealth Group comes in at 32nd place with 4 billion, 634 million. Amgen is right behind them at the 33rd slot with 4 billion, 627 million.
United Technologies appears at 37th place with 4 billion, 373 million. Then lastly we see CVS Caremark at 47th place with 3 billion, 427 million.
Again – nine out of all 50 of the top Fortune 500 companies are pharmaceuticals. These companies alone pulled in almost 65 billion dollars in profits for 2010, close behind the 70 billion made in oil money.
Pharmaceuticals do not jump out this much on the Forbes Global 2000 list. The only pharmaceutical company in the top 20 is Berkshire Hathaway at #8.

The total combined income for oil and pharmaceuticals in the top 50 slots of the Fortune 500 list is 70 billion plus 65 billion — or 135 billion in total.
This does not include 20.9 billion for Atomic Energy Defense activities, nor 124.5 billion in veterans’ benefits, nor 10.1 billion in foreign military aid, nor 44.1 billion in foreign economic aid, nor 7.5 billion in defense-related activities.
The top 100 defense contractors in 2010 only earned about $129.48 billion, based on a rough, approximate calculation — out of a total Department of Defense expenditure of 692 billion for that year. That still leaves 562.5 billion dollars unaccounted for.
The top five defense contractors for 2010 were Lockheed Martin at 16.7 billion, Northrop Grumman at 11.1 billion, Boeing at 10.4 billion, Raytheon at 6.7 billion and SAIC at 4.7 billion.
In order for the ‘core’ of 1,318 companies to be earning 80 percent of the world’s wealth, it would be absolutely essential for them to profit from this enormous defense budget. There’s nothing else like it in the world.
Based on the new findings of the Swiss scientists, many of these defense contractors may be part of a single mega-conglomerate working behind the scenes.
To review, 80 percent of the world’s profits are being earned by a ‘core’ group of 1,318 corporations.
As we look even deeper, we find this ‘core’ is mostly run by a “super-entity” of 147 companies that are totally interlocked. 75 percent of them are financial institutions.
The top 20 companies in the “super-entity” include Barclays Bank, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Merrill Lynch, UBS, Bank of New York, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs.
Many key Federal Reserve personnel work for these companies – and they secretly handed themselves trillions of dollars in free money between 2007 and 2010.
The 147-part “super-entity” has controlling interest in the 1318-part “core”, which in turn has controlling interest in 80 percent of the world’s wealth.
It would be utterly essential for the Federal Reserve corporations, and their beneficiaries, to be heavily invested into oil and pharmaceuticals in order to earn such a tremendous percentage.
Is there any proof that the Federal Reserve elites are, indeed, invested in these and other top businesses? Absolutely.
Let’s now do some historical research on the top two Federal Reserve names we always read about – the Rockefellers and Rothschilds – and see what we find.
John D. Rockefeller, one of the top architects who founded and bankrolled the Federal Reserve System, also owned and ran Standard Oil Company, beginning in 1870. He soon became America’s first billionaire.
Rockefeller’s spectacular oil profits ultimately allowed him to be in a position to essentially buy the United States government — and its ability to print money – via the Federal Reserve.
Standard Oil had a virtual monopoly on producing, transporting, refining and marketing oil up until 1911, when it was broken up by an alarmed United States Supreme Court in antitrust legislation.
Standard Oil of New Jersey became Esso, later to be renamed Exxon – which became a key part of ExxonMobil, currently the most profitable company in the world — earning 30 billion, 460 million dollars.
Standard Oil of California became Chevron – currently the third most profitable company in the world at 19 billion, 24 million dollars per year.
Continental Oil Company became Conoco, now a part of ConocoPhillips – currently the sixteenth most profitable company in the world at 11 billion, 358 million dollars.
BP Amoco is a conglomerate of several Standard Oil splinter companies. Yahoo Finance currently lists BP Amoco’s gross profit at 16 billion, 28 million dollars.
Therefore, four out of the six “supermajors” in the oil industry are direct Rockefeller spinoffs – BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips.
Our Swiss scientists proved that these companies never really broke apart. The 1,318 in the “core” and 147 “super-entity” corporations are extremely interlocked with one another.
Many researchers and insiders have suggested that the single largest Federal Reserve shareholder is the Rothschild family.
I went straight to the source and read their officially-sanctioned The Rothschilds: A Family Portrait, by Frederic Morton, Atheneum Press, New York, 1962, to learn more about them.
I didn’t realize that Frankfurt, Germany was very hostile to Jews in the late 1700s. The Rothschilds lived in the ghetto, were subject to extreme public humiliation, and were nearly broke as of 1764.
16: On his way Mayer could not escape the street urchins whose favorite amusement was to shout, “Jew, do your duty!”—whereupon the Jew had to step aside, take off his hat, and bow.
Having thus entertained the local children, Mayer reached the heavy chains with which soldiers manacled the Judengasse (Jew Street) every night.
The ghetto… [had] an ordinance that barred Frankfurt Jews from farming, from handicrafts, even from dealing in nobler goods such as weapons, silk or fresh fruit….
Another city edict limited the Jews to five hundred families and to no more than twelve marriages a year.
With such extreme public humiliation and oppression, occurring on a daily basis for generations, the Rothschilds may well have lost faith in the goodness and kindness of humanity.
Mayer Amschel Bauer (later “Rothschild”) was born in 1743. After his father’s death, he apprenticed for three years at the Bank of Oppenheimer and became a junior partner.
By then, he had earned enough money to buy his father’s counting house, which was adorned with a red shield, symbolizing the desire for Revolution – thus inspiring him to take the last name “Rothschild.” (The family home he purchased later had a green shield.)
Mayer Amschel soon found ingenious ways to make highly intelligent business deals with top royals, providing banking services to handle all the unpleasant transactions they didn’t want to be involved in.
He won over their good graces through a variety of clever techniques, such as selling them rare and precious coins at absurdly low prices.
I was surprised to see how bluntly the author of The Rothschilds spoke about the level of influence Mayer Amschel’s family came to have on the world – but things were very different in 1962.
13: [In] Frankfurt [Germany]… in a cramped ghetto dwelling… with a yellow star pinned to his caftan, Mayer Amschel Rothschild kept a small store two centuries ago.
[He] married Gutele Schnapper, and raised with her those five incredible sons who conquered the world more thoroughly, more cunningly and much more lastingly than all the Caesars before or all the Hitlers after them.
The Rothschild name is no longer commonly heard in mainstream media – but this wasn’t the case when The Rothschilds was written in 1962. Their deep connections to royalty were openly admitted in the book.
5: No modern name breathes a more storied eminence. No nonroyal family has held so much power so consistently, so peculiarly….
It would be insufficient to sum up the family as “still very wealthy.” The Rothschild fortunes in England and in France are as ineffable as ever….
6: For generations the people at Buckingham Palace have recognized the kinship: Queen Victoria often dined and slept in Rothschild houses; the Duke of Windsor fled to a Rothschild (an Austrian one) directly after his abdication.
11: The two big [Rothschild] banks in London and Paris (probably the world’s largest private financial institutions)… have not so much as a name plate outside.
Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild.
Being privately held partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a single public balance sheet or any other report of their financial condition.
As we read further in The Rothschilds, we find out that Mayer Amschel’s five male children distributed themselves throughout Europe – becoming essentially the world’s first multi-national corporation.
Each of his sons rose to very prominent positions of power – in Germany, Austria, England, Italy and France, respectively.
29: Perhaps the early Romans were the most successful nation we have known; perhaps Napoleon the most formidable individual.
It is quite possible that the people still bustling obscurely at the Green Shield [at the end of the 1780s in Frankfurt’s Jewish ghetto] were the family par excellence in modern history.
As long as Mayer lived alone with his wife, he was… a Caesar without centurions. But soon those boys marched out of Gutele’s womb like so many dauntless legions.
First came Amschel, future treasurer of the German Confederation. Then Salomon, who in the end achieved exactly the exalted station in imperial Vienna that remained [Prince] Landgrave William’s perpetual daydream.
Then Nathan, who rose to more power than any other man in England. Then Kalman, who wound the Italian peninsula around his hand. Then Jacob, who was to lord it in France during Republic and Empire.
Morton’s book does not apologize about the Rothschilds’ behavior. One of the most stunning examples is in the discussion of “consols” beginning on page 49.
“Consols” was short for “consolidated annuities” – essentially the stock of the British government after it consolidated its assets in 1751. Trading “consols” was literally trading the wealth of the British empire – and its people.
The French Empire, under Napoleon, was trying to take over everything in Europe. A seven-nation alliance commanded by the British was fighting back. It was commonly expected that the final outcome of this conflict would be decided at Waterloo.
The battle all happened on June 18, 1815. Napoleon was outnumbered – 72,000 to 118,000. Napoleon surrendered as of 10PM – after 25,000 of his men had been killed or wounded. 19,300 men were killed or wounded on the Anglo-Prussian side – all in a single day.
That much death and destruction in one field was a horror show. Four days later, Major W. E Frye surveyed the damage and had to leave, because he was so traumatized he nearly threw up.
On arrival there the sight was too horrible to behold. I felt sick in the stomach and was obliged to return.
The multitude of carcasses, the heaps of wounded men with mangled limbs unable to move, and perishing from not having their wounds dressed or from hunger, as the Allies were, of course, obliged to take their surgeons and waggons with them, formed a spectacle I shall never forget.
Nathan Rothschild was one of the very first to get the news of the British victory – on the dawn of June 20th. The Rothschilds tells us an agent named Rothworth rushed Nathan the news by boat – beating the official British messenger by several hours.
49: There was no news more precious than the outcome of Waterloo… If Napoleon won, English consols were bound to drop. If he lost, the enemy empire would shatter and consols rise….
Another man in his position would have sunk his worth into consols. But this was Nathan Rothschild… He did not invest. He sold. He dumped consols.
His name was already such that a single substantial move on his part sufficed to bear or bull an issue.
Consols fell. Nathan leaned and leaned, and sold and sold. Consols dropped still more. “Rothschild knows,” the whisper rippled through the ‘Change. “Waterloo is lost.”….
Consols dived, consols plummeted—until, a split second before it was too late, Nathan suddenly bought a giant parcel for a song. Moments afterwards the great news broke, to send consols soaring.
We cannot guess the number of hopes and savings wiped out by this engineered panic… how many liveried servants, how many Watteaus and Rembrandts… [Rothschild] won that single day.
If you don’t understand what happened, he basically tricked everyone into selling everything they had, and then bought it all back on the cheap – right before the stock prices skyrocketed.


The single greatest way to make money and secure control is to stage a mass panic. That was the lesson. If everyone sells and you know exactly the right moment to buy, you can achieve seemingly limitless power.
As the Amazon commenter “SmokeNMirrors” pointed out on August 7, 2009,
Nathan himself believed that with that move he came to control the British money supply, and with it the whole of the British Empire.
That wealth begets wealth is well known; if less than 2 centuries ago one family essentially owned the British Empire, there is a very real chance that that fortune is now many times larger than it was then….
What is beyond doubt is that they have controlled the Federal Reserve since its creation (indeed, it was their creation!) and officially the Bank of England since at least the mid-1800s.
The Rothschilds’ own sanctioned family biography reveals the extent of power they came to hold throughout Europe.
However, blaming all this on the Jewish people would be a fatal and ridiculous mistake. Any time we begin demonizing whole races of people, we have voted for genocide.
The motivations and philosophies behind these “banking families” are rooted in secret societies that have nothing to do with Judaism, as we will soon see.
I do believe that forgiveness – despite the atrocities that have been and are being committed – will serve us much better than any desire for vigilante justice.
I have had multiple, trusted insider contacts tell me that the younger generations of this and other top banking families want to create radical, positive changes.
They do not share the cynical, negative attitude towards humanity that many of their elders still have.
Furthermore, the “system” is so large, so interconnected and so woven through all aspects of our society that the only valid way to transform it is from within.
Knowledge is the key. The system has thrived in secrecy. The truth will set us free.
Though this information is a closely-guarded secret, there have been enough leaks to confirm the identities of the key banking families who founded the Federal Reserve.
By now, many of them should sound familiar to you – since they used the Federal Reserve to bail themselves out:
J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.
They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London;the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches.
He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.
Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3] The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.
Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4]
Now that we’ve touched on the Rockefeller oil and Rothschild banking aspects of the Federal Reserve, let’s move back to pharmaceuticals for a minute.
Again, nine out of the top 50 most profitable Fortune 500 companies in 2010 were pharmaceuticals – at a total of 64 billion, 924.6 million dollars in profits.
Most people are unaware of the blatant crimes against humanity that have been committed by the biggest pharmaceutical companies:
The US Government Accountability Office says that far from being a font of innovation, the drug market… spends virtually nothing on the diseases that kill the most human beings, like malaria, because the victims are poor, so there’s hardly any profit to be sucked out….
Many pharmaceutical companies are in the business of creating “me too” drugs. They take a popular drug, change it by at little as one molecule, and re-release it as a new product.
This generates massive amounts of profits – and it is costing us dearly:
A detailed study by Dr Marcia Angell, the former editor of the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, says that only 14 percent of [pharmaceutical companies’] budgets go on developing drugs — usually at the uncreative final part of the drug-trail.
The rest goes on marketing and profits.
And even with that puny 14 percent, drug companies squander a fortune developing “me-too” drugs — medicines that do exactly the same job as a drug that already exists, but has one molecule different, so they can take out a new patent, and receive another avalanche of profits….
The European Union’s competition commissioner, Neelie Kroes, recently concluded that Europeans pay 40 percent more for their medicines than they should because of this “rotten” system — money that could be saving many lives if it was redirected towards real health care.
The pharmaceutical giant Pfizer manufactures chicken feed for factory-raised birds. The droppings of these birds are then fed to factory-raised cattle.
A recent expose’ revealed that Pfizer has been putting arsenic in their chicken feed to allegedly kill parasites and stimulate faster growth.
For many years they argued this did not pass into the meat, but all went out as waste.
Recently this was proven incorrect by the FDA. All factory-raised chicken meat could have had arsenic in it – a deadly poison. This makes it very likely that factory-raised beef may have had arsenic as well.
Though this product Roxarsone has now been pulled from shelves in the United States, Pfizer indicated it won’t necessarily pull it from about a dozen other countries unless regulators force them to.
The toxic poisoning of arsenic creates health problems. Most people try to solve their health problems by taking pharmaceuticals – rather than changing their diets, such as to ethically-raised organic meats.
Foster Gamble’s “Fact Checking” section of the Thrive Movement website reveals that the American Medical Association was financed by the Rockefellers (Federal Reserve).
If you own and control the pharmaceutical industry, it would certainly make sense to secretly run the agency in charge of regulating your products:
Fact: The American Medical Association (AMA) is largely funded by the Rockefellers, who in turn use their funding to influence AMA research and decision-making.
The Rockefeller Foundation website points to various connections between the American Medical Association and the Foundation. Here are a few examples:

Rockefeller Foundation Annual Report, 1932

Rockefeller Foundation Annual Report, 1957

Making the eHealth Connection: Participants

The Long Road to Universal Health Coverage

The American Medical Association has been accepting money from the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations from as early as 1910.
In The World Without Cancer G. Edward Griffin makes the argument that the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations began to support the AMA in an effort to control the medical schooling establishment and to gain power over this “large and vital sphere of American life.”
If the pharmaceutical industry is putting profits over people, and gouging money out of an already strapped economy, then why would we keep it?
Johann Hari reveals the answer – they literally bought the government.
Why would we keep this system, if it is so bad?
The drug companies have spent more than $3 billion on lobbyists and political “contributions” over the past decade in the US alone. They have paid politicians to make the system work in their interests.
If you doubt how deeply this influence goes, listen to a Republican congressman, Walter Burton, who admitted of the last big health care legislation passed in the US in 2003: “The pharmaceutical lobbyists wrote the bill.”
This is where the lines between government, military, finance, defense contractors and corporations all begin to blur. At the core of all this is a “super-entity” of 147 companies – 75 percent of which are financial institutions.
A hugely popular Rolling Stone article by Matt Tabibi systematically revealed how Goldman Sachs is at the center of an incestuous relationship between Wall Street, the elected government and the Federal Reserve.
This article earned 23,000 Facebook Likes and 268 written comments as a result of its stunning journalism – most of which I won’t include here due to its complexity:
[Goldman Sachs] seemed to count on the unwillingness or inability of federal regulators to stop them — and when called to Washington last year to explain their behavior, Goldman executives brazenly misled Congress, apparently confident that their perjury would carry no serious consequences….
Goldman… [is] a powerful, well-connected firm, with the ear of the president and the Treasury, that appears to have conquered the entire regulatory structure — and stands now on the precipice of officially getting away with one of the biggest financial crimes in history.
The fact that this evidence [covered throughout the article] comes from a U.S. senator’s office, and not the FBI or the SEC, is itself an element in the worsening tale of lawlessness and despotism that sparked a global economic meltdown….
If the Justice Department fails to give the American people a chance to judge this case — if Goldman skates without so much as a trial — it will confirm once and for all the embarrassing truth: that the law in America is subjective, and crime is defined not by what you did, but by who you are.
Most people go with the “gut” rather than with scientific facts.
Go ahead and try to tell someone that a “super-entity” of 147 corporations appears to be running the world, and those corporations are completely interconnected with the Federal Reserve – which handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailouts, without any regulation or oversight from the American government.
You may find yourself coming face-to-face with very strong denial, ridicule and attack — even in the face of undeniable evidence.
Our Swiss scientist James Glattfelder, who used supercomputers to prove that a small number of companies control the majority of the world’s wealth, spoke directly to the skeptics in this next quote:
“Reality is so complex, we must move away from dogma, whether it’s conspiracy theories or free-market,” says James Glattfelder.
“Our analysis is reality-based.”
The next question you would reasonably ask yourself is this: How the hell have these people avoided getting caught for the last 100-plus years?
What if it were possible to discourage critical thinking in the public – so people would never put all the pieces together? One useful way to do this would be to control the educational system.
Again, I understand that I am hitting a brick wall with the “average person” by bringing this up, as they cannot face the possibility that the world they live in has been so deeply manipulated and compromised.
Nonetheless, Foster Gamble’s “Fact Checks” section of the Thrive Movement website makes a compelling case that this is what happened.
The Federal Reserve created the National Education Association via the Rockefeller family:
By way of grants, they spent millions of dollars, money which was used to radically bend the traditionalist education system toward a new system that favored standardized testing over critical thinking, toward “scientific management” in schools.
This was part of a calculated plan to make the schooling system benefit corporate America, at the expense of the American school child. Powerful foundations with private interests, such as the Ford Foundation, continue to support, and thereby influence the policy of, the NEA to this day.
Additionally, an unprecedented U.S. Congressional investigation into tax-exempt foundations identified the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations engagement in an agenda for vast population control.
Norman Dodd, Research Director for the Congressional Committee, found this statement in the archives of the Carnegie endowment:
In order for such a vastly interconnected group to avoid detection for this long, it would also be an absolute requirement for them to buy, own and control the media.
You will soon see compelling, documented proof that the power elite were already bragging about this accomplishment by 1815 – the same year Nathan Rothschild won the British government on a bet.
However, we will review recent history first, so as to better understand how today’s world of seemingly hundreds of independent media sources is actually quite tightly controlled.
In 1983, there were 50 different independent media companies in the United States. By 2004, this number had reduced to five key players: Time Warner, Disney, News Corporation (FOX), Bertelsmann of Germany and Viacom (formerly CBS).
Ben Bagdikian expertly lays out all the proof for this media in his updated 2004 edition of The New Media Monopoly.
These five huge corporations — Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) — own most of the newspapers, magazines, books, radio and TV stations, and movie studios of the United States….
These five are not just large — though they are all among the 325 largest corporations in the world — they are unique among all huge corporations: they are a major factor in changing the politics of the United States, and they condition the social values of children and adults alike.
A more recent investigation by revealed that the vast majority of media in the United States is dominated by six mega-corporations: General Electric, Walt Disney, News Corp, Time Warner, Viacom and CBS.
[As you delve into the individual categories of cable, television, print, telecom and radio, you find a few more companies chasing behind the Big Six – but not many.]
These companies often control the entire creative process of a film or television show from beginning to ending – making it an ideal environment for creating propaganda:
The U.S. media landscape is dominated by massive corporations that, through a history of mergers and acquisitions, have concentrated their control over what we see, hear and read.
In many cases, these giant companies are vertically integrated, controlling everything from initial production to final distribution.
Three of these mega-conglomerates appear on Fortune 500’s Top 50 Most Profitable list for 2010:
This includes General Electric at 11 billion, 644 million; Walt Disney at 3 billion, 963 million; and Comcast at 3 billion, 635 million.
General Electric is also the world’s third biggest public company – according to the Forbes 2000 list.
You may not realize that most of the cable channels on American television are international. Subtitles are used in foreign countries. This is part of why so many people now speak English.
Therefore, the scope of this media consolidation is truly worldwide. Bertelsmann is the only company among Ben Bagdikian’s “Big Five” that is not primarily centered in the United States.
In his seminal work, Bagdikian reveals how these five main companies are shaping and molding society:
These Big Five (with General Electric’s NBC a close sixth) do not manufacture automobiles, or clothing, or nuts and bolts. They manufacture politics and social values.
The media conglomerates have been a major force in creating conservative and far right politics in the country.
They have almost single-handedly as a group, in their radio and television dominance, produced a coarse and vulgar culture that celebrates the most demeaning characteristics in the human psyche — greed, deceit, and cheating as a legitimate way to win (as in the various “reality” shows).
All this being said, it would be a terrible mistake to arrest and imprison the lower, middle and upper-mid-level staff in the media as if they are all complicit in the problem.
CEOs may not fully understand what’s going on either. They are well-paid to be the scapegoats when all hell breaks loose. The biggest powers are always those who work behind the scenes.
This was well underway by 1948, with a little-known CIA project called Operation Mockingbird. Many documents have since been leaked or declassified on this subject.
Spartacus Educational is overflowing with documentation and links you can read – including references to multiple academic books investigating the subject.
In 1948 Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects. Soon afterwards it was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC).
This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on “propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world.”
Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic American media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry….
According to Deborah Davis (Katharine the Great): “By the early 1950s, Wisner ‘owned’ respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles.”…
The New York Times actually revealed a small part of this explosive story in 2007.
The C.I.A. monitoring of journalists in 1963, 1971 and 1972, including wiretapping their phones and setting up observation posts across the street from their offices to track their comings and goings and their visitors, was a practice that the White House itself employed during the Nixon administration….
As with other questionable or illegal C.I.A. activities that were endorsed by top government officials, this account shows that spying on reporters was approved at the highest levels of the Kennedy administration….
By ordering the director of central intelligence to conduct a program of domestic surveillance, Kennedy set a precedent that Presidents Johnson, Nixon, and George W. Bush would follow.
The top investigative books on this subject include A Very Private Woman by Nina Burleigh, Mockingbird: The Subversion of the Free Press by the CIA by Alex Constantine, The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America by Hugh Wilford, Who Paid the Piper? by Frances Stonor Saunders and The Very Best Men by Evan Thomas.
This consolidated control did not fizzle out in more recent years. It has only gotten worse.
After a shocking betrayal, Conan O’Brien led the pack in revealing how centralized the media still is today.
Very few entities within the mainstream media have ever risen up against their own companies – but Conan O’Brien is a rare exception who should definitely be mentioned at this point.
Conan O’Brien was spectacularly humiliated by Big Media in January 2010 – only seven months after NBC made him the host of the Tonight Show, fulfilling a long-term contract from 2004.
NBC felt Conan’s ratings weren’t high enough. In a classic power-play attempt, NBC tried to force Conan to give the coveted 11:30 slot back to Jay Leno and settle for a show that didn’t begin until 12:05 am.
He soon won a 40 million-dollar settlement for him and his staff due to this obvious breach of contract – and gave a healthy portion of his side of the settlement to his staff as well.
After this stunning public humiliation, Conan sank into a deep depression:
I grew up watching Johnny Carson every night and the chance to one day sit in that chair has meant everything to me.
I worked long and hard to get that opportunity, passed up far more lucrative offers, and since 2004 I have spent literally hundreds of hours thinking of ways to extend the franchise long into the future.
“I felt like I’d just been in a car accident,” O’Brien admits to the mag.
His wife Liza Powel says Conan suffered from depression…
“I hated to see him in such a state of tension and unhappiness,” Powel says on a more serious note. “It was very painful for him to let go of this hallowed ground that he’d finally got a chance to stand on.
In late September 2011, Conan announced on his relatively-new TBS show that he was going to officiate over the first same-sex wedding on television – between his costume designer Scott Cronick and his partner David Gorshein.
The mainstream media covered the story – but not with very much originality.
Fully eighteen different news and entertainment shows, from all different networks, were shown reading the same script – almost always word-for-word.
The key phrase revealed on Conan’s show was “Conan O’Brien may be about to push the envelope on late-night television.”
Conan thinly disguised this as comedy – when in fact it was a shocking, unprecedented expose’ of just how thoroughly centralized and controlled the media really is:
These facts clearly establish that the mainstream media is heavily consolidated and controlled – despite there being seemingly limitless television channels and media sources.
However, we still haven’t proven that the largest media corporations are interconnected with the Federal Reserve banking families – which dominate the “super-entity” of the top 147 corporations on Earth.
I was surprised to find out that nine of the biggest media corporations on Earth are also controlling partners in the pharmaceutical / healthcare industry.
A recent FAIR study of nine major media corporations and their major outlets, Disney (ABC), General Electric (NBC), CBS, Time Warner (CNN, Time), News Corporation (Fox), New York Times Co., Washington Post Co. (Newsweek), Tribune Co. (Chicago Tribune, L.A. Times) and Gannett (USA Today) found connections to six different insurance companies.
Five out of the nine media corporations studied shared a director with an insurance company; two insurance companies—Chubb and Berkshire Hathaway—were represented by more than one media corporation director.The study also found crossover between these media corporations and several large pharmaceutical companies, such as Eli Lilly, Merck and Novartis….
Out of the nine media corporations studied, six had directors who also represented the interests of at least one pharmaceutical company. In fact, save for CBS, every media corporation had board connections to either an insurance or pharmaceutical company….
Media Corporation
Insurance & Pharmaceutical Companies
Procter & Gamble
Chubb, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, Merck
Time Warner
AIG, Health Cap, Paratek Pharmaceuticals
Fox/News Corp
GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Hybritech
New York Times Co.
First Health Group, Eli Lilly
Tribune Co.
Abbott Labs, Middelbrook Pharmaceuticals
Gannett/USA Today
Now step back and think about what we have learned so far in the course of this investigation.
The Federal Reserve handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailout money – to themselves. To their own companies. To their own banks.
That means they’re suffering. This is not something they would have done if they weren’t forced to. They are experiencing real trouble – and it’s affecting global headlines with rumors of financial collapse.
According to former Forbes Asia-Pacific bureau chief Benjamin Fulford, the 2008 collapse was caused by an international coalition of countries who are actively resisting the Federal Reserve group.
The Federal Reserve appears to control, directly or indirectly, 1,318 corporations that earn up to 80 percent of the world’s wealth. 147 corporations within that group are totally interconnected with each other, and earn 40 percent of global revenues.
Global media was consolidated from 50 independent corporations to five giants in barely over 20 years – from 1983 to 2004.
One of the top two or three most profitable businesses in America is the healthcare industry. In order for the “super-entity” of 147 corporations to control 80 percent of the wealth, they would almost certainly need to invest in healthcare.
Six out of the top nine media corporations have directors with controlling interests in the pharmaceutical companies.
Eight out of the top nine media corporations have insurance and / or pharmaceutical company executives serving on their Board of Directors.
This is precisely the type of interconnectedness discovered by the Swiss team of scientists – using supercomputers.
Conan O’Brien was burned badly by Big Media – and got his revenge almost two years later, by revealing how virtually every television network was reading off of the same prepared script.
This obviously presents us with a major problem. These plans are so well-constructed, so interconnected that it seems almost impossible to believe they exist – or could ever be stopped.
Most people automatically put this sort of data into the category of “supernatural.” If they dare to entertain the idea that this is all really true, they will be paralyzed with unspeakable, sleepless paranoia.
In order to get back to leading functional lives, most people naturally go into complete denial – making excuses for why the things they read could not be true.
Let me be clear: that won’t make it go away.
In President Woodrow Wilson’s 1913 book The New Freedom, Section 1, “The Old Order Changeth,” page 13, he said the following:
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.
“They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
This is only one of a series of revealing quotes at the above link that show how concerned Wilson was about the Federal Reserve.
Any serious effort to expose what is going on – or to reveal the insiders responsible for causing the problem – is almost certainly not going to appear in the mainstream media. At least not yet.
As one example, you do not see any disclaimers during television commercials telling you that the network has a controlling interest in the drugs they are advertising – even though this is a conflict of interest.
Hardly anything about Goldman Sachs or the auditing of the Federal Reserve has appeared in the mainstream media – even as we seem to be poised on the brink of a repeat of the 2008 financial collapse.
Now don’t forget what we learned: THEY STOLE TWENTY SIX TRILLION DOLLARS.
How much have you heard about this in the mainstream media?
How much more proof do you need that the Federal Reserve, and its affiliates, control the media?
However, let’s again be clear: a majority of the people in the media want to do an honest job of reporting. As soon as the threat of speaking out is taken away, there will be an incredible abundance of new data.
Obviously, such a vastly coordinated effort would require secrecy and planning on an almost unimaginable level — spanning hundreds of years. Few people can even imagine how such a thing could be possible.
In Spring 1992, I crashed into the truth while taking a sociology class at the State University of New York at New Paltz entitled “Contemporary Social Issues.”
Our college professor matter-of-factly informed us of many great conspiracies that I had never heard about before then – setting me on a path that has now led up to our discussion here.
After taking that class, and another one covering similar topics, I wanted more – but there was very little of this sort of material available at the time. I didn’t even know where to look.
Then, in 1994, I found The Character, Claims and Practical Workings of Freemasonry by Rev. C.G. Finney in a used bookstore – and it completely changed my life.
Finney’s book revealed key events that defined American history throughout much of the 1800s.
This knowledge was already starting to be lost to the younger generations – due to deliberate, calculated media suppression – by the time he wrote the book in 1869.
The Masonic Order is normally seen as just a fraternal organization that runs hospitals and boring “lodge” meetings with a bunch of old men sitting around and talking.
However, in 1826, a man named Captain William Morgan attempted to publish the exact details of the first three degrees of Freemasonry for the general public.
Morgan’s book was entitled Illustrations of Masonry by one of the Fraternity Who has devoted Thirty Years to the Subject. It was finally released in 1827 in Batavia, New York on an independent label.
Freemasons are taught that anyone who reveals the secrets of the Order will be brutally murdered. Morgan was indeed kidnapped and killed by fellow Masons – despite having a wife and two children.

This scandal became public, and ultimately led to over 45,000 out of 50,000 total Masons in the United States “disfellowshipping” and leaving the Order.
Over two thousand lodges completely shut down – including virtually every lodge in the Northern states – within less than a decade.
This is an incredibly important moment in American history. It all happened roughly 180 years ago. I never heard a word about it in the Rockefeller-financed American public educational system.
Batavia, New York erected the William Morgan Pillar in his honor on September 13, 1882, as you see here.
A huge political movement called the Anti-Masonic Party was formed soon after Morgan’s death. A variety of high-level meetings occurred at the state government level to address the problem – and hopefully eliminate it.
Remember that in those days, under the Constitution, the states carried most of the political power. Therefore, a meeting in the assembly hall of the state capitol of New York was extremely significant.
The key book Finney quoted from in his 1869 text, describing these events, was Light on Masonry by Elder David Bernard — from 1829.
Back in college it was impossible for me to track down Bernard’s book – but now, thanks to the far reach of the Internet, I was able to order two copies of it from Kessinger Publishing.
After I quote from Finney’s book, we’ll also read some of the most significant parts of Bernard’s Light on Masonry as well. Taken together, they paint an extremely compelling picture.
By restoring this information that was carefully suppressed from the pages of history, we can clearly identify the blueprints of meticulous planning, over at least the last 200 years — held in the utmost secrecy.
Now let’s begin with the most significant quotes from Rev. Finney’s classic book:
Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1869 by the Western Tract and Book Society, in the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of Ohio….
1: Forty years ago we supposed that [Freemasonry] was dead, and had no idea that it could ever revive. But, strange to tell, while we were busy in getting rid of slavery, Freemasonry has revived, and extended its bounds most alarmingly….
9: About forty years ago, an estimable man by the name of William Morgan, then residing in Batavia, N.Y., being a Freemason, after much reflection, made up his mind that it was his duty to publish Freemasonry to the world.
He regarded it as highly injurious to the cause of Christ, and as eminently dangerous to the government of our country.
I suppose [he] was aware, as Masons generally were at that time, that nearly all the civil offices in the country were in the hands of Freemasons; and that the press was completely under their control, and almost altogether in their hands.
Masons at that time boasted that all the civil offices in the country were in their hands. I believe that all the civil offices in the county where I resided while I belonged to them, were in their hands.
I do not recollect a magistrate, or a constable, or sheriff in that county that was not at that time a Freemason….
As you can now see, the control of the media and elected government by a secretive group of powerful individuals was well-known in the early 1800s.
Finney said the press was “completely under their control” – as well as “nearly all the civil offices in the country.”
Henry L. Valance confessed in 1848 that Morgan was murdered by drowning. Rocks were tied to a rope around his waist. The total weight of the rocks was greater than his own body.
Morgan was then dumped into the Niagara River after crying and pleading with his captors for his life. This obvious Masonic murder ultimately caused the whole story to break open.
[Years later, ex-Masons working at the state government level created a substantial trust fund to help compensate Morgan’s wife and children for their loss.]
Let’s continue with the excerpts from Finney’s book:
11: Two or three [Masons] have since, upon their death-bed, confessed their part in the [murder of William Morgan]….
The account of the manner in which this was done will be found in a book published by Elder Stearns… entitled “Stearns on Masonry”.
It contains the deathbed confession of one of the murderers of William Morgan. On page 311, of that work, you will find the confession….
“CONFESSION. The Murder of William Morgan, Confessed by the Man Who, With His Own Hands, Pushed Him Out of the Boat Into Niagara River!”
17: [The Masons] also kidnapped Mr. Miller, the publisher; but the citizens of Batavia, finding it out, pursued the kidnappers, and finally rescued him.
11: The courts of justice found themselves entirely unable to make any headway against the wide-spread conspiracy that was formed among Masons in respect to this matter.
These are matters of record. It was found that they could do nothing with the courts, with the sheriffs, with the witnesses, or with the jurors; and all their efforts were for a time entirely impotent.
Indeed, they never were able to prove the murder of Morgan, and bring it home to the individuals who perpetrated it.
18: In consequence of the publication of Morgan’s book, and the revelations that were made in regard to the kidnapping and murdering of Mr. Morgan, great numbers of Masons were led to consider the subject more fully than they had done; and the conscientious among them almost universally renounced Masonry altogether.
I believe that about two thousand lodges, as a consequence of these revelations, were suspended.
The ex-president of a Western college, who is himself a Freemason, has recently published some very important information on the subject, though he justifies Masonry.
He says that, out of a little more than fifty thousand Masons in the United States at that time, forty-five thousand turned their backs upon the lodge to enter the lodge no more.
18: Conventions were called of Masons that were disposed to renounce it. One was held at Leroy, another at Philadelphia, and others…
At one of these large conventions they appointed a committee to superintend the publication of Masonry in all its degrees.
19: Elder Bernard… with the assistance of his brethren who had been appointed to this work, obtained an accurate version of some forty eight degrees.
He published also the proceedings of those conventions… and also several speeches that were made by prominent men in the State of New York.
This work was entitled “Light on Masonry.”… Great pains were taken to secure the most accurate knowledge of the degrees published by the committee….
20: In the Northern or non-slaveholding States Masonry was almost universally renounced at that time.
But it was found that it had taken so deep a root that in all New England there was scarcely a newspaper in which the death of William Morgan, and the circumstances connected therewith, could be published.
This was so generally true throughout all the North that newspapers had to be everywhere established for the purpose of making the disclosures that were necessary in regard to its true character and tendency.
The same game is being played over again at the present day. The “Cynosure,” the new anti Masonic paper published at Chicago, is constantly intercepted on its way to subscribers…. The editor informs me that the [issues] are constantly intercepted….
It was found that Masonry so completely baffled the courts of law, and obstructed the course of justice, that it was forced into politics; and for a time the anti-masonic sentiment of the Northern States carried all before it.
Almost all Masons became ashamed of it, felt themselves disgraced by having any connection with it, and publicly renounced it.
If they did not publish any renunciation, they suspended their lodges, had no more to do with it, and did not pretend to deny that Masonry had been published.
21: Now these facts were so notorious, so universally known and confessed, that those of us who were acquainted with them at the time had no idea that Masonry would have the impudence ever again to claim any public respect.
I should just as soon expect slavery to be re-established in this country, and become more popular than ever before – to take possession of the Government and of all the civil offices, and to grow bold, impudent, and defiant – as I should have expected that Masonry would achieve what it has….
34: It was found that there was no other way than for the people to rise up and take the offices out of their hands by political action.
At first there was no thought on the part of any one, so far as I could learn, that it would ever become a political question. But it was soon found that there was no other alternative.
41: In February, 1828, a convention of seceding Masons was held at Le Roy, in the County of Genesee [New York], composed of some thirty or forty of the most respectable citizens.
They published a declaration to the world under their signatures… [that] the revelations of William Morgan… [were] strictly true and accurate.
In the course of the same year, Elder Bernard, a Baptist clergyman of good character, and who was a distinguished Mason, published… “Light on Masonry”….
41-42: In 1829, on the trial of Elihu Mather, in Orleans County, the obligations of the first three degrees and of a Royal Arch Mason, were proved, at a Circuit Court held by Judge Gardiner, by the testimony of three seceding Masons and one adhering Mason.
In obedience to a resolution of the Senate of New York, Judge Gardiner reported this evidence, and it was printed by order of the Senate.
In 1830, on a trial in Rhode Island, the same obligations were proved in open court, and the trial was published at large in the newspapers.
In 1831, on the trial of H.C. Witherell, at New Berlin, in Chenango County, the same obligations were proved by the oaths of three adhering Masons, among whom was General Welch, the sheriff of the county.
In the year 1830, Avery Allyn, a regular Knight Templar, published a book, called the “Ritual of Freemasonry,” in which the ceremonies of initiation, the lectures oaths and mummeries of thirty-one degrees are fully exhibited.
Thousands of Masons individually have, under their names in the public papers, declared these publications of Bernard and Allyn to be strictly accurate.
90: All Masons above the third, or Master’s degree, are sworn to keep inviolate the secrets of a brother, murder and treason excepted, up to the seventh, or Royal Arch degree.
In the oath of this degree the candidate… swears to keep all the secrets of a companion of this degree, murder and treason not excepted. All Masons of and above this degree are solemnly bound to do this….
After swearing to the same points contained in previously taken oaths, the kneeling candidate, with hands on the Holy Bible, proceeds: “I furthermore promise and swear, that I will aid and assist a companion Royal Arch Mason when engaged in any difficulty, and espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, if within my power, whether he be right or wrong.”
What you’ve just read are the passages I highlighted in my copy of Finney’s book back when I first read it – along with a few others that jumped out at me as I reviewed it for this investigation.
At the time, I felt Bernard’s Light on Masonry was totally lost – a victim of crushing media suppression. It was only while working on this investigation that I tried to find it on Amazon.
My two copies of “Light on Masonry” only arrived in the mail a few weeks ago. I was not disappointed.
It took some time, but I worked my way through the book and found the most important passages – as you are about to read.
Light on Masonry – David Bernard – 1829
Secretary of the Convention of Seceding Masons, held at Le Roy, July 4th and 5th, 1828.
William Williams, Printer, Utica, NY, 1829.
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the thirteenth day of April, in the fifty-third year of the Independence of the United States of America, A.D. 1829, David Bernard, of the said District, hath deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof he claims as author, in the words following, to wit:
“Light on Masonry: a collection of all the most important documents….”
R.R. Lansing, Clerk of the District Court of the United States; for the Northern District of New-York.
392: An Address to All Honest Masons. In Eight Numbers. (Originally published in 1828, in the Le Roy Gazette, Genesee county, N.Y.)
395: No. III. [Written address submitted by an anonymous former Mason.]
It is well known to all ‘active Masons’ and to persons generally, that in the dark conclave and secret meetings of Masons, have been planned conspiracies that have caused convulsions which have been felt in every part of the government under which they were bound to live as good citizens.
There has been planned and executed deeds by them in their midnight conspiracies, (I cannot call such meetings by a more gentle term,) at which humanity as revolted.
In France all was thrown into confusion, and anarchy came near ruling a people striving for liberty, by the society of Free Masons. At one time, considering they had all power, they throw off all disguise and discovered their real object….
But France is not alone in having her liberties invaded by Masons. It at one time came near overthrowing the government of Germany, and those that were honest Masons among them separated and forsook the institution….
396: Masonry was considered in Spain, Portugal, and Russia, of such a dangerous tendency, that it was put down by the strong arm of the law. It is now disturbing the tranquility of our brethren in South America.
(Appendix, pg. 27)
Appendix, No. II. Proceedings of a Convention of Delegates, from the different Counties in the state of New-York, opposed to Free Masonry.
Held at the Capitol in the City of Albany, on the 19th, 20th and 21st days of February, 1829.
Of whose proceedings the following sheets furnish a history, was called by the following notice:–
The Delegates met in the Assembly Chamber of the Capitol at the City of Albany, on the 19th day of February, 1829, at four o’clock, P.M., and were called to order by Samuel M. Hopkins, delegate from Albany County….
33: More than four hundred initiates, within our own state, including Members of every Degree, from an Entered Apprentice to the Thrice Illustrious Knights of the Holy Trinity, have publicly renounced the Institution.
Thousands have silently withdrawn, and it cannot be presumed that any good man, who received it upon trust, will continue his connexion with the Fraternity after he has thoroughly examined the tendency of its principles.
34: Perhaps we cannot convey a bolder or more comprehensive view out of fancied power and unchastened ambition of Free Masonry, than is found in the Oration of the late W. F. Brainard, at New-London, Ct., before the Union Lodge, June 24, 1825, on the recurrence of one of her fabulous Anniversaries.
Mr. Brainard says—
“What is Masonry now? IT IS POWERFUL. It comprises men of RANK, wealth, office and talent, in power and out of power; and that in almost every place where power is of any importance.
And it comprises among other classes of the community, to the lowest, in large numbers, active men, united together, and capable of being directed by the efforts of others, so as to have the FORCE of CONCERT throughout the civilized world!
They are distributed too, with the means of knowing one another, and the means of keeping secret, and the means of co-operating, in the desk – in the legislative hall – on the BENCH – in every gathering of business – in every party of pleasure – in every ENTERPRISE of GOVERNMENT – in every domestic circle – in peace and in war – among enemies and friends – in one place as well as in another!
SO POWERFUL indeed, is it at this time, [June 24th, 1825] that it fears nothing from violence, either public or private; for it has every means, to learn it in season to COUNTERACT, DEFEAT and PUNISH IT!”
FELLOW-CITIZENS— A great crisis has occurred in our social condition.
The peace of this community has been extensively disturbed, the domestic security of the citizens openly violated, their property unlawfully invaded, and the life of one of them, without doubt, feloniously destroyed.
And these calamitous events have proceeded from a source which threatens our most valuable institutions, and all those possessions which make life desirable.
With these facts deeply impressed upon our hearts, we have been delegated to assemble here, to consult together, and advise upon the proper course to be pursued, in so momentous an emergency….
When the public peace, our domestic safety, our property, our life, our reputation, our equal rights as citizens, are all assailed, by the concerted action of numerous, wealthy, intelligent, and powerful bodies of men;
and the regular operations of our constituted authorities is found unable to protect us, then, it is most equally becoming to our minds and hearts, to our self-respect, and the most cherished interests of human liberty, that we should protect ourselves whatever evils may ensue….
53: In our country the people are the only legitimate source of civil power. It is the will of the people by which laws are enacted, and applied to the various rights and pursuits of life.
This will calls into employment, elective, legislative, judicial, and executive bodies, which are only the instruments by which it is brought into visible and useful action.
But the will of a state, or nation, like the will of an individual, depends upon opinion,—the opinion of a majority of the people of a state, or nation; and the opinion of such majority is PUBLIC OPINION.
—Public opinion, therefore, controlling the will of the people, in every free country, must govern every thing, which is properly subject to governmental power.
This is the theory of our government. It is clearly the only theory consistent with the rights of man. And among us, it has been so well applied in practice, heretofore, as to ensure the good anticipated by the framers of our government.
But we have recently witnessed an alarming change. The machinery of our government has become obviously disordered.
—Free Masonry has come into violent collision with it; and its healthful operations are now either suspended, or rendered ineffectual.
And the great question is now presented to the people of this state, what shall be done to restore it to its salutary and effectual operation….
Free Masonry is a distinct, peculiar, independent government. It acknowledges no allegiance to civil government, nor alliance with it.
It has departments of its own, titles of its own, officers of its own, laws of its own, revenues of its own, oaths of its own, penalties of its own, sympathies of its own, and purposes of its own.
All the nations of the earth, however diverse their forms of government, or distant their territories, are but its provinces. It has no jurisdictional limits but the habitable globe.
Throughout its whole extent, it secures the loyalty of its subjects, by cords most ingeniously twisted, and of surpassing strength….
The possibility of its existence is dangerous; its actual occurrence demands instant, resolute, continued, and united, though prudent, exertion, till it shall become impossible….
WILLIAM FINN, President…. Rochester, March 15, 1829.
These meetings and speeches directly led to the formation of the Anti-Masonic Party, the first “third party” in the history of American politics.
William A. Palmer was elected governor of Vermont in 1831, on an Anti-Masonic ticket, and held that office until 1836. Joseph Ritner was elected governor of Pennsylvania from 1835 to 1838.
William Wirt ran for President on the Anti-Masonic ticket in 1832, and won all seven electoral votes from Vermont as well as 7.78 percent of the popular vote.
After this Presidential defeat in 1832, the Anti-Masonic Party merged with the Whig Party. I heard about the Whigs briefly in grade school, but had no idea of the suppressed history behind them.
In December 1996, my knowledge on this subject took a quantum leap when I found New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies by William T. Still, at Borders Bookstore in Albany, New York.
I still consider this book to be the defining standard of scholarship for this subject. It quotes from Finney’s book and many, many others, forming a much more complete picture of these events:
118: The furor over the murder of William Morgan in 1826 had caused American Masonry to almost cease to exist, and European Masonry was in turmoil as well.
Bavaria had forbidden Masonry as a danger to the state in 1784, then again in 1845.
In 1814, the Regency of Milan and the Governor of Venice had acted in a similar manner.
King John VI of Portugal prohibited Freemasonry in 1816, and renewed it in 1824.
In 1820 several lodges were closed in Prussia for political intrigues, and in the same year Alexander I banished the order from the whole Russian empire. A similar occurrence took place four years later in Spain….
108: As a result of this [Morgan] scandal, the anti-Masonic party was formed. It polled 128,000 votes in the 1830 election and carried Vermont in the 1832 presidential election.
Rhode Island and Vermont passed laws against blood oaths. Thousands of Masons burned their aprons. In a few years’ time, membership in the New York lodges dropped from 30,000 to 300 as a direct result of the Morgan incident. [29]
[29. William J. Whalen, Christianity and American Freemasonry, (Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publishing Co., 1958), p. 9.]
By 1866, every degree of Masonry had been published and widely scrutinized – particularly by people in the Northern states.
In response, the Masonic establishment decided to release Duncan’s Masonic Ritual and Monitor. It revealed the first seven degrees in detail – including illustrations of the gestures and handshakes.
[Now, Masons tell me they are strictly forbidden from reading this or other books that expose the inner workings of the Order.]
Interestingly, the very first paragraph of the book addresses the Morgan scandal, and attempts to downplay it:
3: [Freemasonry] has, at various times and in several countries, incurred the ill-will of political parties and of religious bodies – in consequence of a belief, on their part, that the organization was not so purely benevolent and philanthropic as its members proclaimed it to be.
In the State of New York, many years ago, it was supposed, but we think unjustly, to wield a powerful political influence, and to employ it unscrupulously for sinister ends.
The war between Masonry and Anti-Masonry which convulsed the State at that period is still fresh in the remembrance of many a party veteran.
The Order, however, has long since recovered from the obloquy then heaped upon it, and is now in a flourishing condition in most parts of the civilized world.
Finney’s book reveals that one of the main focal-points of Anti-Masonic sentiment was the oaths that a seventh-degree Royal Arch Mason would be forced to swear to.
There is a small but very significant difference between the Masonic oaths published by Ballard as opposed to those in Duncan’s Ritual Monitor of Freemasonry.
Here are some of the key quotes from Ballard’s Light on Masonry that created so much distress as to nearly destroy Masonry in America – causing 45,000 out of 50,000 members to quit.
Masons must swear on pain of death to uphold these principles.
130: I will promote a companion Royal Arch Mason’s political preferment in preference to another of equal qualifications. [Some lodges also include “I will vote for a companion Royal Arch Mason, before any other of equal qualifications.”]
Furthermore, do I promise and swear, that a companion Royal Arch Mason’s secrets, given me in charge as such, and I knowing them to be such, shall remain as secure and inviolable in my breast as in his own, murder and treason not excepted.
Ballard reveals that the line “murder and treason not excepted” was only administered in some of the Masonic chapters. It did not appear in Duncan’s Monitor – but it is still implied, as we will see.
Furthermore, the line about promoting a fellow Royal Arch Mason politically was completely deleted from Duncan’s Monitor.
Since the Masonic oaths are orally transmitted, there are superficial differences throughout Duncan’s Monitor and Ballard’s Light on Masonry.
However, despite deleting the phrases about politics, murder and treason, Duncan’s Monitor still maintained much of the original, troubling verbiage – as we see here.
230: I furthermore promise and swear, that I will employ a Companion Royal Arch Mason in preference to any other person of equal qualifications.
I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.
I furthermore promise and swear, that I will keep all the secrets of a Companion Royal Arch Mason (when communicated so me as such, or I knowing them to be such), without exceptions….
To all which I do most solemnly and sincerely promise and swear, with a firm and steadfast resolution to keep and perform the same, without any equivocation, mental reservation, or self-evasion of mind in me whatever;
binding myself under no less penalty, than to have my skull smote off, and my brains exposed to the scorching rays of the meridian sun, should I knowingly or willfully violate or transgress any part of this my solemn oath or obligation of a Royal Arch Mason.
So help me God….
Scottish Rite Masonry goes up to 33 degrees – though the 33rd is an honorary title reserved only for a select few. Light on Masonry reveals data from all 33 degrees – and other offshoots.
The Anti-Masonic Party was deeply concerned about Freemasonry’s openly blatant attack on Christianity – particularly in the 28th degree of Masonry, Knight Adept of the Sun (or the Eagle).
Here is a direct excerpt of what the initiate hears as he is receiving the 28th degree.
265: Requisitions to make a good Mason.—If you ask me what are the requisite qualities that a Mason must be possessed of, to come to the centre of truth, I answer you, that you must crush the head of the serpent of ignorance.
You must shake off the yoke of infant prejudice, concerning the mysteries of the reigning religion, which worship has been imaginary, and only founded on the spirit of pride….
[The reigning religion] employs every matter to satisfy carnal desires, and raises to these predominant passions, altars, upon which she maintains, without ceasing, the light of iniquity, and sacrifices continually offerings to luxury, voluptuousness, hatred, envy, and perjury.
Behold, my dear brother, what you must fight against, and destroy, before you can come to the knowledge of the true good and sovereign happiness!
Behold this monster which you must conquer – a serpent which we detest as an idol, that is adored by the idiot and the vulgar under the name of RELIGION!!!
According to the author’s written-in commentary on the thirty-second degree, or Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret, Prince of Masons, an apocalyptic war with Arabs is highly desired.
294: The ostensible object of this [thirty-second] degree is the invasion of the Holy Land, and its deliverance from the infidels.
This is to be effected by uniting all the Masons, ancient and modern, under one commander, and directing them ‘en masse’ upon the Mahometans, who have wickedly established themselves in that sacred region.
Hence the complexion of this degree is military. The draft or carpet contains the plan of this ‘MASONIC ARMY!’…
It is believed that the ceremonies of initiation have never been committed to writing, or practiced in North America; hence, though many have received the obligation, words, signs, &c. formally, they remain like the rest of the world ignorant of the peculiar rites of the degree.
There is very little about the 33rd degree in Light on Masonry. However, when you read through the 32nd degree, you can clearly see that Masons are being taught to hate.
This hate is supposed to become such a passion that it blinds them to all else in life.
You may not be aware that the legend of “Friday the 13th” being unlucky may stem from a mass arrest of Knight Templars, including their leader Jacques De Molay, that occurred on Friday, October 13th, 1307.
Not all scholars agree with this, but it was presented in “The Da Vinci Code” as if it were the truth.
What you are about to read is directly spoken to the 32nd degree candidate during his initiation.
300: The captivity of the Grand Elect and Sublime Masons, (i.e. by the Chaldeans,) shows us the persecution of the Christian religion under the Roman emperors, and its liberty under Constantine the Great.
It also calls to our remembrance the persecution of the Templars, and the situation of Jacques De Molay, who lying in irons nearly seven years, at the end of which our worthy Grand Master was burnt alive with his four companions, on the eleventh of March, 1314, creating pity and tears in the people, who saw him die with firmness and heroic constancy, sealing his innocence with his blood.
My dear brother, in passing to the degree of Perfect Master, in which you shed tears at the tomb of Hiram Abiff, and in some other degrees, has not your heart been led to revenge?…
By the degree of Master Elect and Kadosh [30th degree], you are properly disposed to fulfill all your engagements, and to bear an implacable hatred to the Knights of Malta*, and to avenge the death of Jacques De Molay.
[*The reader must not suppose that the Masonic Knights of Malta are here intended; the reference is to the ancient order of that name, which, when the order of Templars was suppressed, received their estates.]
Your extensive acquaintance with symbolic Masonry, which you have attained by your discretion, leaves you nothing more to desire here.
The addition of the Knight Templars material, and most of the higher degrees of Freemasonry, did not come about until the 1760s.
In The New Knighthood, historian Malcolm Barber explained this in detail.
It was during the 1760s that German masons introduced a specific Templar connection, claiming that the Order, through its occupation of the Temple of Solomon, had been the repository of secret wisdom and magical powers, which James of Molay had handed down to his successor before his execution and of which the eighteenth-century Freemasons were the direct heirs.
Barber, Malcolm (1994). The New Knighthood: A History of the Order of the Temple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521420415, pp. 317–318.
Some Masons have told me the 32nd Degree initiates are now simply known as Knight Templars.
If we continue directly from where we left off, we also see that the 32nd degree Mason is told he has now entered into the ranks of bloodline royalty – not by birth, but by his membership in the Order.
This rank is conferred by a mysterious “society of men” that is only referred to in passing, as the initiate continues to be spoken to during his ceremony.
300: You see, my dear brother, how, and by whom, Masonry has come to us.
You are to endeavor by every just means to regain our rights, and to remember that we are joined by a society of men, whose courage, merit, and good conduct, hold out to us that rank that birth alone gave to our ancestors.
You are now on the same level with them.
Avoid every evil by carefully keeping your obligations, and carefully conceal from the vulgar what you are, and wait that happy moment when we all shall be reunited under the same Sovereign in mansions of eternal bliss.
“The vulgar” is a term Masons use for anyone who is not a member of their group. This same “society of men” instructed the initiate in the 28th degree to “crush the head of the serpent… of RELIGION.”
I’m not sure I would use the term “good conduct” to describe the actions of this society of men.


All you read in Light on Masonry for the final 33rd degree is a rather ominous-sounding description of what the room is like where “the obligation” is accepted.
When you first walk in, you see the words “Deus meum que jus” over the door. This roughly translates as God’s [Deus] Authority [Jus] is mine [Meum],” or God [Deus] is mine [meum] as well as [que] Reason and Authority [jus].”
A transparent glass equilateral triangle then hangs down before you enter into a canopy of purple curtains.
The room is then dominated by a triangular altar, guarded by a full-sized skeleton holding a Masonic staff and a poniard – a long, lightweight thrusting knife – in attack position.
“Death’s heads” and skull and crossbones images are all seen as well.
The highest-ranking officer, or Thrice Puissant Sovereign, wears a blood-red robe with a black sash. He has a stunning crown on his head like a European king – and he carries a sword.
The bottom of the sash has a rose of red, white and green. The center of the sash has the number 33 inside a triangle with rays coming off of it, and the image of a poniard knife running through the triangle.
The jewel that is mounted on the sash is a double-headed eagle clutching a sword. The eagle’s beak, claws and sword are made of gold.
Back when Light on Masonry was written, no more than nine 33rd-degree Masons were allowed in any given kingdom or republic.
What we do not see in any of the degrees is a clear indication of why they want to control the media, dominate the financial system, or attempt to create a global control matrix.
It appears that Masonry is only a cover for the “society of men” referred to in the 32nd degree – who despise religion, elevate their highest members to the level of royalty, and say “God’s Authority is Mine.”
Were they wise enough to insure that their ultimate intentions were not explicitly written into the Masonic oaths and obligations?
Apparently so.
William T. Still’s 1990 book New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies fills in the missing details – through the words of other esteemed Masonic scholars.
30: One of the greatest secrets of Masonry, and of all the secret societies, is something called the “Great Plan,” the details of which are known only to those with access to the inner doctrine. As one Masonic scholar explained:
Though the whole extent and origin of the plan was known only to an initiate few, members of the outer order were subjected to a selective system by which they could attain to numerous degrees and proportionately receive deeper insight into the work.
This in turn spurred them to greater effort and endeavor in their various occupations and stations in life, and made them useful instruments. [38]
[38. Marie Bauer Hall, Collections of Emblemes, Ancient and Moderne, by George Wither to which is Added Foundations Unearthed, (Los Angeles: Veritat Foundation, 1987), p. 14.]
This outer doctrine allows the average member to see his organization as little more than a social fraternity involved in a few charitable works.
However, for those who are judged ready, or “worthy” to accept it, the inner doctrine drops all pretense of this idealism.
What exactly is this “Great Plan” that Still is referring to? Apparently we’re seeing it now. Masonry provided the secrecy necessary for a small group to gain control of the planet and its resources.
It is a documented historical fact that Adam Weishaupt headed a group in Bavaria (now a part of Germany) that called themselves the Illuminati – meaning the Enlightened Ones. This is thoroughly examined in Chapter Five of Still’s book, “Weishaupt’s Illuminati.”
According to a research paper by Andrew Hitchcock, Adam Weishaupt was paid to start this group by none other than Mayer Amschel Rothschild – in 1770.
On page 69, Still says Weishaupt was indoctrinated into Egyptian occultism in 1771 by a merchant named Kolmer – and spent five years formulating the plan to consolidate all occult systems into a single organization.
One book that details the proof for the Rothschilds financing the Bavarian Illuminati is Pawns in the Game by Wm. Guy Carr – which is listed with publication dates as far back as 1956 on Amazon.
Carr’s book alleges that Mayer Rothschild convened a meeting of twelve other wealthy men at his home in Frankfort, Germany as of 1773 – back when his family still lived under the Green Shield in the ghetto.
From there, they created a 25-point strategy for Rothschild’s new group, “The Illuminati.”
Let’s not forget that the higher degrees of Freemasonry had only been created in the late 1760s.
In a seeming act of Divine Intervention, lightning struck a courier who was riding to the meeting on horseback, carrying the full 25-point strategy in his inside jacket pocket. He was killed instantly.
The authorities went through all the courier’s belongings and were shocked to find this document. All 25 points are published, in full, on various websites, such as this one.
Here are the points that stood out the most to me. Remember – this is not a conspiracy theory; the seizure of this document was an established fact, causing extreme concern in the Bavarian government.
#1 Use violence and terrorism rather than academic discussions….
#4 Any and all means were justified, on the grounds that a moral code left a politician vulnerable….
#6 Remain invisible until the very moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can undermine it….
#7 Use Mob Psychology to control the masses. “Without absolute despotism ” one cannot rule efficiently
#8 Advocate the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral corruption and all forms of vice, used systematically by “agenteurs” to corrupt the youth
#9 Seize property by any means and without hesitation, to secure submission and sovereignty.
#10 Foment wars, but direct the peace conferences so that neither of the combatants gain territory. They would be placed further in debt and therefore into our power.
#12 Choose candidates for public office who will be servile and obedient to our commands, so they may be readily used as PAWNS IN OUR GAME
#13 Use the Press for propaganda to control all outlets of public information, while remaining in the shadows, clear of blame
#14 Make the masses believe they had been the prey of criminals. Then restore order to appear as the saviors.
#15 Create financial panics; use hunger to subjugate the masses.
#16 Infiltrate Freemasonry… “When the hour strikes for our sovereign Lord of all the World to be crowned, these same hands will sweep away everything that might stand in his way.”….
#18 a Reign of Terror is the most economical way to bring about speedy subjection.
#19 Masquerade as political, financial and economic advisers to carry out our mandates… without fear of exposing “the secret power behind national and international affairs.”
#20 ULTIMATE WORLD GOVERNMENT is the goal. It will be necessary to establish huge monopolies, so even the largest fortunes… [will] go to the bottom together with the credit of their governments ON THE DAY AFTER THE GREAT POLITICAL SMASH.”
#21 Economic War. Rob the Goyim of their landed properties and industries with a combination of high taxes and unfair competition.
#22 Make the Goyim destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat [poor] left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest.
#23 Call it THE NEW ORDER. Appoint a Dictator….
I understand how disturbing this must be. The farther into this investigation we go, the more unsettling it becomes – and we’re not done yet.
The principles of this 25-point document appear to have been meticulously followed in the 238 years since its original drafting.
In fact, it is quite remarkable to see how precisely this document outlines the plans we are seeing come to fruition today.
Despite the discovery of this 25-point document in 1773, Weishaupt still launched the Order of the Illuminati on May Day, 1776.
William T. Still says the Bavarian Illuminati’s exposure and downfall was primarily due to a high-level disagreement that began in 1786.
The details of this exposure were published by the highly respected British historian Professor John Robison — a professor of natural philosophy at Edinburgh University and a Mason for many years.
Robison’s book Proofs of a Conspiracy exposed the Illuminati in 1798 — and “caused a sensation in the United States” among the Founding Fathers.
On page 74-75 of Still’s book, he reveals that candidates for the Illuminati were “almost always drawn from Masonic lodges of the day,” just as we saw in Point #16.
Baron von Knigge was the third-highest ranking member of the original Rothschild / Weishaupt Illuminati, and took on the code-name of Philo.
Von Knigge began to disagree with Weishaupt’s plan to try to push atheism on the members of the lower degrees. He felt it was better to “defer the development of the bold principles till we had firmly secured the man.”
As time went on, von Knigge realized that Weishaupt’s ultimate goal was to instill a belief in Lucifer as a benevolent God-figure. This caused him to feel the Order had been “painted… in the colors of hell, and would have scared the most intrepid.” (Still, p. 79.)
Von Knigge left in 1783, and informed the Bavarian government of the danger the Illuminati presented. The government then banned all secret societies the following year.
Four other Illuminati members, each of whom were professors, fled the order in April 1785. The Bavarian government summoned them to a court of inquiry — and they all spilled the beans.
The professors revealed that the Illuminati wished to annihilate all religion, all love of country and all love between parents and children.
Suicide was to be encouraged as a “voluptuous pleasure.”
This testimony was more than enough legal grounds to act. Nonetheless, the Bavarian government was very careful – and they didn’t make their move until the following year.
On October 11, 1786, the Bavarian government raided the chief Illuminati lawyer Herr von Zwack’s home – and seized a treasure-trove of documents.
These documents were then published and widely distributed as Original Writings of the Order of the Illuminati.
The Bavarian government sent this book to every government in Europe – but no one took it seriously, even though the members of the Illuminati acknowledged the documents were real.
Still also reveals that European “Continental” Masonry was wedded with the Illuminati — beginning with a written agreement as of December 20, 1781.
This was finalized in the still-secret Congress of Wilhelmsbad in July 1782. The Comte de Virieu spoke out in his biography about what had occurred at this meeting.
82: All this is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which is being woven is so well thought out that it will be… impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape it. [46]
[46. Nesta H. Webster, World Revolution, (Devon, UK: Britons Publishing Co., 1971 edition, originally pub. 1921), p. 31.]
According to Still, after this agreement in 1782, the headquarters of “Illuminized” European Freemasonry was moved to the Rothschilds’ home town of Frankfurt — and was securely within their control.
According to Monsignor George Dillon, the Illuminati – i.e. “the supreme government of all the Secret Societies of the world” – fell into the hands of Italy after Weishaupt’s death in 1830 (Still, p. 119).
[Monsignor George E. Dillon, D.D., Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked as the Secret Power Behind Communism, (Metairie, LA: Sons of Liberty revised edition 1950; original edition New York: Burns and Oats, 1885), p. 50-51.]
Guiseppe Mazzini was the head of the highest Italian lodge, the Alta Vendita, at this time.
The Alta Vendita controlled the French, English and German lodges at the highest levels.
The Alta Vendita was originally started by none other than Kalman (Karl) Rothschild, “who wound the Italian peninsula around his hand,” as we learned on page 29 of The Rothschilds.
Mazzini’s dream was not going to be easy to achieve. The Anti-Masonic Revolt was in full swing in the United States by this time – and it was creating public and governmental uprisings all over the world.
One of the top Alta Vendita chiefs named Nubius died mysteriously in the 1830s – and this released many incriminating documents that allowed historians like Monsignor Dillon to put the pieces together.
The Illuminati’s plans at the time included the legitimizing and legalizing of prostitution, the elimination of morality from literature, and the introduction of atheism and hostility towards religion into education.
From here, Still’s book reveals how Mazzini worked to unify all Masonic circles in the world – ultimately gaining the allegiance of Albert Pike, who had become the unifying head of Masonry in the United States.
121: Even though Mazzini was able to take control of Italian Masonry, the task of uniting World Masonry was still formidable. Italian Masons in particular, and World Masonry in general, were divided into numerous rival sub-groups, frequently hostile to one another.
Around 1860, after many years of struggling to unite European Masonry, Mazzini wrote to Albert Pike, the recognized leader of Scottish Rite Masonry in the United States, to discuss the possibility of including the United States in an international group.
After the 1826 murder of Captain William Morgan, Pike tried to regroup American Masonry, which had been all but eliminated between 1830 and 1840. Many American lodges were forced to disband until the storm of public criticism abated….
123: So pronounced was anti-Masonic sentiment that it was an issue when Congress tried to impeach President Johnson in March 1867.
Ten years after Mazzini first wrote to Pike, they were able to hammer out an agreement to unify all the Masonic groups in Europe and America.
This agreement also allowed more of the Illuminati philosophy to be blended into the Masonic groups at the highest degree levels.
In order to understand the agreement Mazzini and Pike made, some further context needs to be filled in first.
The secret beliefs of the Illuminati included the idea that there is a “Great Architect” of the Universe, divided into two polarities – the Christian God, which they called Adonay, and Lucifer.
In this system, Lucifer is not seen as “the bad guy” – merely one of the two Divine aspects of the Great Architect.
The idea of Lucifer falling and becoming “Satan” is rejected within the inner teachings of this philosophy.
In the Bible, Lucifer originally appears as the highest and brightest angel of all. Illuminists believe Lucifer was kicked out because the Christian God was actually the bad guy.
Their arguments were founded on the Church’s suppression freedom, sexuality and scientific inquiry – wisdom. The Church was the government back then, and they demanded obedience.
Jacques DeMolay, whose torture we heard about in the 32nd degree of Freemasonry, was tortured by the Church – as were many others who preserved the ancient mystery school traditions.
While I agree that the Church had become a repressive system, I don’t see the need to demonize every Bible teaching as the work of an evil, jealous, power-mad god – but that’s what happened.
“Morals and Dogma” was Pike’s most popular book – released in 1871, a year after his secret agreement with Mazzini was formalized.
Morals and Dogma is considered an essential text of Masonry, providing commentary on each and every degree. Pike’s true opinions on Lucifer are only hinted at, in commentaries on the third and nineteenth degrees.
III. The Master….
The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god, but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry.
For the Initiates, this is not a Person, but a Force, created for good, but which may serve for evil. It is the instrument of Liberty or Free Will.
They represent this Force, which presides over the physical generation, [i.e., sex] under the mythologic and horned form of the God PAN; thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the Light-bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer of the legend.
Gold, to the eyes of the Initiates, is Light condensed.
Council of Kadosh: XIX, Grand Pontiff….
The Apocalypse is, to those who receive the nineteenth Degree, the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer.
LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning!
Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!
Let’s put together what Pike just said here. First of all, he feels Lucifer is a force created for good, which may serve for evil but doesn’t necessarily have to.
“Feeble, sensual or selfish Souls” will be blinded by the “light” that Lucifer bears.
Pike implies that anyone who is not “feeble, sensual or selfish” may be able to experience the “good” aspect of the Luciferian force.
These “hints” could cause some Masons to start asking questions – which might ultimately cause them to be invited into the Illuminati.
Pike says that the Luciferian force is “Liberty or Free Will.” This apparently indicates that Luciferians can practice Free Will to its fullest extent – doing whatever they choose, without ethical or moral constraints.
This becomes clearer in other secret documents that were leaked, as we shall see.
In 1870, the year before he published Morals and Dogma, Pike finalized the agreement with Mazzini that led to the consolidation of all Masonic groups in Europe and the United States.
As we see in this quote from Still’s book, they brought more of the teachings of the Illuminati and Luciferianism into Masonry, through introducing the “New and Reformed Palladian Rite”.
123: In 1870, Mazzini and Pike reached an agreement for the creation of the new supreme rite, to be called the New and Reformed Palladian Rite….
Membership in the “Palladium” was very limited, and its deliberations were shrouded in the strictest secrecy:
No mention of it would ever be made in the assemblies of the Lodges and Inner Shrines of other rites… for the secret of the new institution was only to be divulged with the greatest caution to a chosen few belonging to the ordinary high grades.
Palladism is essentially a Luciferian rite. Its religion is Manichean neo-gnosticism, teaching that the divinity is dual and that Lucifer is the equal of Adonay…. [25]
[25. Edith Starr Miller, Occult Theocracy. Hawthorne, CA: The Christian Book Club of America, 1933, p. 217.]
By 1889, Pike had surpassed Mazzini to become the head of World Masonry, as well as American Masonry and D.C. Masonry.
From this power position, he wrote an edict for the “23 Supreme Councils of the world” on July 14, 1889. These appear to be the top-ranking control groups for all Masonic circles in Europe and America.
This, again, was a highly secret document — leaked by those who saw the danger it presented. It is only thanks to these heroes that we are aware of what the ultimate plans of this group have always been.
This all-important quote can be found in A.C. De La Rive’s book, La Femme et l’Enfant dans la Franc-Maconnerie Universelle, and appears on page 123 in Still’s book.
That which we must say to the crowd is—We worship a God, but it is the God that one adores without superstition.
To you, Sovereign Grand Inspectors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st, and 30th degrees—The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.
If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay (The God of the Christians) whose deeds prove his cruelty… and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion for science, would Adonay and his priests calumniate him?
Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black.
That is why the intelligent disciples of Zoroaster, as well as, after them, the Gnostics, the Manicheans and the Templars have admitted, as the only logical metaphysical conceptions, the system of the two divine principles fighting eternally, and one cannot believe the one inferior in power to the other.
Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is heresy; and the true and pure philosophic religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil. [27]
[27. Miller, p. 220-221; secondary quote from A.C. De La Rive, “Instructions” issued by Gen. Albert Pike on July 14, 1889, to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world as recorded in La Femme et l’Enfant dans la Franc-Maconnerie Universelle, p. 588.]
Pike was clearly wrong about Zoroastrians saying these “two divine principles” are “fighting eternally” and are of equal power.
As I write in The Source Field Investigations, Zoroastrianism does acknowledge a negative force in the universe, which they call “The Adversary”.
However, the most current research from Boyce and Grenet has clearly revealed that God created the Adversary to be defeated at the end of the Age – which they called “Fraso-Kererti”.
They said the Adversary would be defeated gradually, and finally groan to a halt — thanks to “the focused efforts of the just.”
The Zoroastrian description of the End of the Age is very similar to what we see now.
This cycle shift-point from one Age to the next has been calibrated by many ancient cultures as occurring on or around the end of this year 2012 – as I reveal in my new bestseller, The Source Field Investigations.
I worked very carefully to insure the absolute secrecy of the content of this book right up until it was actually in published form — specifically because we were well aware of the dangers involved in telegraphing the move.
Some people could conceivably argue that Luciferianism is merely a philosophical construct that should be protected under the banner of religious freedom like any other.
Obviously, Christians have a knee-jerk reaction to the word Lucifer – but ultimately, if Luciferians respect the rights and sovereignty of others, under the US Constitution, they can think whatever they want.
However, Still’s book reveals that Pike and Mazzini made major additions to the plan for how their secret group – the “Illuminati” – could seize control of the planet, financially and politically.
Their plan was to deliberately create three world wars – on false pretenses. This means killing people and orchestrating events behind the scenes to create death and bloodshed on a level never before seen.
Two out of three of these wars appeared exactly as planned. The third World War – a battle with a ragtag group of terrorists in the Middle East – has been attempted for some time, but still has not succeeded.
Nonetheless, it is obvious that the struggle to create this Third World War is very much a present-day issue. The Federal Reserve “super-entity” is still following the old script as if it were Scripture.
The fact that this document was kept in plain, public view for many years in the British Museum Library shows that the truth is indeed out there – for those who are capable of hearing it.
Again, I wouldn’t write about any of this if I didn’t firmly believe this group is about to be defeated.
Here are the key passages in Still’s book that had such a huge effect on me when I first read them in 1996.
127: Although they had finally united Italy, Mazzini and Pike realized that the unification of all Europe under the banner of Illuminism would be extremely difficult, if not impossible.
Nationalism runs strongly in the human spirit, and is very difficult to erase, especially on a continent divided by warfare for many centuries.
Therefore, they set to work on their greatest plan — a plan so vast in scope that only a reader familiar with the great power wielded by the secret societies could begin to believe it.
In 1871, Mazzini issued a letter in which he outlined the final three-part plan of the Illuminati: their grand design for ridding not just Europe, but the entire world of Christianity, and bringing it under the “illuminated” dictatorship of Luciferianism.
This remarkable letter was for many years on display in the British Museum Library in London. [32]
[32. Salem Kirban, Satan’s Angels Exposed, 1980, p. 161.]
127: Mazzini proposed a series of world wars.
These wars were to embroil every nation in a conflict so bloody and chaotic that eventually every nation would surrender its national sovereignty to an international government, like the League of Nations, or the second attempt – the current United Nations – in order to prevent subsequent global bloodletting….
The first of these world wars, they hoped, would topple the Czarist government of Russia and establish an Illuminized dictatorship – a new level in the game of control of populations.
This would give the Illuminists a secure base from which to operate, with a large population and vast natural resources to fuel the new engine of Illuminism.
The second World War would allow the new Soviet Russia to capture Europe – or as it turned out, half of it.
The third World War would be in the Middle East between the Moslems and the Jews, and would bring about the biblical Armageddon.
Certainly by the end of this Third World War, the battle-wearied nations would be ready to accept any proposal so long as it promised peace, uniting the entire world under the fatal banner of the Luciferian New World Order. [34]
[34. Kirban, p. 162-163.]
127: Pike wrote to Mazzini about the consequences of the Third World War in 1871:
[It will] provoke a formidable social cataclysm… and the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries [terrorists], will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity,…
…will be without a compass, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally into public view.
[This is] a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
Everything I’ve shared with you is documented, historical fact. Much of it came from insiders who broke away from the group and revealed their testimony.
This is still happening today – and as a result, we have strong reason to believe the Illuminati is very much alive and well today.
I have had personal interaction with a woman named Svali, who claims to have been a mid-level member of the modern-day Illuminati – the living inheritors of this plan – up until she escaped in the early 1990s.
Svali’s writings are extremely extensive – enough to fill several books. I was directly responsible for orchestrating and transcribing her one and only surviving radio appearance – on Greg Szymanski’s show on Republic Broadcasting Network, on January 17, 2006.
While studying her discussion forum on her website at the time,, I saw her say in December 2005 that she was ready to break her silence and go on the radio.
Greg Szymanski’s name came up as one of two choices. I immediately wrote him an urgent letter with her contact info. She and I also began a written communication that unfortunately ended after the show.
I appeared as a call-in guest on the show towards the end and thank her for her bravery. I deliberately misspelled my own last name in the transcript to make it less obvious that I had helped orchestrate this.
Svali has never again made a single written, public statement anywhere after this show aired in January, 2006, but we do know that she is alive. She was severely tortured for doing this radio show.
If Svali is correct, this “pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally into public view” is called The Revealing. She had been told it was planned for the year 2020.
The Revealing was not planned to occur on any ordinary day. The formula calls for a global economic collapse to provoke the “formidable social cataclysm” planned by Pike and Mazzini.
I do not believe The Revealing will ever happen — due to the widespread awakening now reaching critical mass in the public.
Pike and Mazzini were not wise enough to have foreseen the possibility of a worldwide, totally free and unregulated media – thanks to the Internet. This was the single most critical failure in their plan.
The resulting public awakening has directly led to the efforts of 122 nations, as we will soon discuss, to break the media stranglehold, expose the truth and free the planet.
Things had to get to a critical crisis-point in order for there to be a strong enough will, worldwide, for this group to finally be defeated – but that will is here now.
However, before we discuss the resolution of this problem, there are yet additional walls of denial that need to be shattered.
I understand that these following sections will be the most troubling parts of the investigation – but again, we have reached a planetary crisis point, and we can no longer afford to stay in denial of the truth.
What you are about to read is excerpts from a written interview Svali gave with H. J. Springer, the founder of the now-defunct Centrex News website, in 2000.
I pulled the original links below off of
All of Svali’s works, including these written interviews and the transcript of the radio show, have now been compiled and arranged at
Let me make it very clear that eyewitness testimony is considered evidence admissible in court. Should that evidence then be verifiable, that testimony is considered legal proof.
Other authors who heavily validate and support Svali’s testimony, and are extremely challenging to read, include Brice Taylor (Thanks for the Memories), Cathy O’Brien (Trance-Formation of America and Access Denied), Annie McKenna (Paperclip Dolls), Kathleen Sullivan (Unshackled), Carol Rutz (A Nation Betrayed,) Lynn & Cheryl Hersha (Secret Weapons) [some argue this book is a CIA whitewash], Wanda Karriker (Morning, Come Quickly), “Mauri” (Vatican Ratline), Janet Thomas (Day Breaks Over Dharamsala), James Shelby Downward (King-Kill 33 and The Carnivals of Life and Death), and Fritz Springmeier (Bloodlines of the Illuminati, The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind-Controlled Slave and Deeper Insights Into The Illuminati Formula).
After we discuss Svali’s testimony, we will briefly explore tangible information that verifies Svali’s allegations in the everyday world.
The volume of written data generated by Svali is very extensive – several hundred pages. The radio show I linked to above is extremely gripping… and utterly compelling.
She talks with speed and confidence about very complex and difficult subjects. Furthermore, our historical research verifies many of the key aspects of her testimony.
Svali’s life was threatened after she did that show, and she went into hiding. She never once attempted to profit off of the hundreds and hundreds of pages’ worth of material she wrote to expose this group.
Though other survivors have come forward, Svali was the highest-ranking member thus far, and has provided the greatest amount of written documentation of her knowledge and experience.
After her radio interview, I alerted Henry Makow to her work, as he was already publishing investigations along these lines. Soon afterwards, he wrote an article that gave a great overview of her testimony:
I’ve tried to avoid the “ritual abuse” discussions as much as possible in these excerpts, so as to protect you from having to read about these troubling subjects unless you decide to get more involved.
Suffice it to say that hallucinogenic drugs, hypnosis and torture — primarily through electroshocks — can apparently create personality fragments that have their own separate sense of self, and can be isolated from the others by “amnesic barriers.”
For now, let’s focus on some of the specific facts about the organization itself that Svali gave.
Q: Svali, I think our readers are wondering ‘Is the Illuminati a religion, secret society, satanism or is it a combination of it, or something different all together, or more sinister?’
A: The Illuminati is a group that practices a form of faith known as “enlightenment”. It is Luciferian, and they teach their followers that their roots go back to the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, and Celtic druidism.
They have taken what they consider the “best” of each, the foundational practices, and joined them together into a strongly occult discipline.
Many groups at the local level worship ancient deities such as “El”, “Baal”, and “Ashtarte”, as well as “Isis and Osiris” and “Set”.
This said, the leadership councils at times scoff at the more “primitive” practices of the anarchical, or lower levels.
I remember when I was on council in San Diego, they called the high priests and priestesses the “slicers and dicers”, who kept the “lower levels happy”.
This is not to offend anyone, it only shows that at the leadership levels, they often believe they are more scientifically and cognitively driven. But they still practice the principles of enlightenment.
There are 12 steps to this, also known as “the 12 steps of discipline’ and they also teach traveling astral planes, time travel, and other metaphysical phenomena. [DW: We will cover the 12 steps in a minute.]
Do people really do this, or is it a drug induced hallucination ? I cannot judge.
I saw things that I believe cannot be rationally explained when in this group, things that frightened me, but I can only say that it could be a combination of cult mind control, drug inductions, hypnosis, and some true demonic activity.
How much of each, I cannot begin to guess. I do know that these people teach and practice evil.
At the higher levels, the group is no longer people in robes chanting in front of bonfires.
Leadership councils have administrators who handle finances (and trust me, this group makes money. That alone would keep it going even if the rest were just religious hog wash).
The leadership levels include businessmen, bankers, and local community leaders. They are intelligent, well educated, and active in their churches.
Above local leadership councils are the regional councils, who give dictates to the groups below them, help form the policies and agendas for each region, and who interact with the local leadership councils.
At the national level, there are extremely wealthy people who finance these goals and interact with the leaders of other countries.
The Illuminati are international. Secret? By all means. The first thing a child learns from “family, or the Order” as they are called, is “The first rule of the Order is secrecy”.
This is why you don’t hear from more survivors who get out. The lengths that this group goes to, to terrify its members into not disclosing, is unbelievable.
Q: Svali, one of the more important points, which I am sure a lot of readers would like to know more about, is, what is the Illuminati /Freemason connection, as far as you are aware of, given your previous position in the Illuminati?
Q: Was – and is – there an infiltration of the Masonic Order?
A: The Freemasons and the Illuminati are hand in glove. I don’t care if this steps on any toes, it’s a fact.
The masonic temple at Alexandria, Virginia (the city itself was named after Alexandria, Egypt, and is a hotbed of Illuminati activity) is a center in the Washington, DC area for Illuminati scholarship and teaching.
I was taken there at intervals for testing, to step up a level, for scholarship, and high ceremonies. The leaders in this masonic group were also Illuminists.
This has been true of every large city I have lived in. The top Freemasons were also top Illuminists.
My maternal grandparents were both high ranking Masons in the city of Pittsburgh, Pa. (president of the Eastern Star and 33rd degree Mason) and they both were also leaders in the Illuminati in that area.
Are all Masons Illuminati? No, especially at the lower levels, I believe they know nothing of the practices that occur in the middle of the night in the larger temples.
Many are probably fine businessmen and Christians. But I have never known a 32 degree or above who wasn’t Illuminati, and the group helped create Freemasonry as a “front” for their activities.
I want to address another misconception. That is, the one that the Illuminists know that they are evil.
When I was in the group, I and those around me were ideologically committed to the agenda as being GOOD.
I thought I was helping others reach their full potential when I was a trainer.
I believed that after years of sweat and hard work, that my intelligence won out, and that I made an excellent leader.
I fought Jonathan and others on the council when I thought they were unfair, and stood up for the people beneath me. Others did the same. They honestly think they are doing a GOOD thing, and if you told them it was wrong, or evil, they would look confused.
It took a LOT of therapy and deprogramming myself, doing reality checks with noncult people to realize that it was all a lie.
I was devastated. I had dedicated my life to helping others bring in the glorious new order, and then found out it was EVIL and abusive. I went through a period of intense grieving/mourning over this.
Most Illuminists I knew weren’t evil, they were deceived. Only the top leadership perhaps were consciously being hurtful.
The Illuminati believe in controlling an area through its: banks and financial institutions (guess how many sit on banking boards? You’d be surprised)
Local government: guess how many get elected to local city councils?
Law: children are encouraged to go to law school and medical school.
Media: others are encouraged to go to journalism school, and members help fund local papers.
I saw a large amount of money being used to fund the projects of this group, funds that poured in from around the northern hemisphere and the world.
Couriers were sent to the corners of the globe, and many of the top financial institutions had a vested interest in bringing this “new world order” to pass.
This was discussed in leadership meetings; shown in videos to members of the group (such as the grainy films I saw in the 1960s showing a large round table with 13 members sitting around it, and the words “these are your leaders” spoken as the members rose and pledged allegiance to the coming new order.)
I will not mention the figures shown in this film in order to avoid the claim of “libel” but they were well known, influential, and many were behind the banking system of the modern world.
[DW: In this subsequent article, Svali revealed that the Rothschilds and Rockefellers both hold seats on the Supreme World Council that is intended to rule in “the New Order to come.”]
The Illuminati are funding this coming world order quietly, behind the scenes.
They believe that money not only “talks” as the saying goes, but buys media coverage, or silence; protection; and the influence needed to shape our modern world….
Are the Illuminati out to rule the world? Yes, and this is what they teach their members. They are working avidly towards this goal even as I write.
The Illuminati and their followers are a minority of our world’s population. In San Diego county, where the population is over 2 million, there existed 5 years ago 24 sister groups with membership of roughly 60 to 75 each. Leadership council over the county was 13 members.
So, in a metro center with over 2 million, the active Illuminists comprised less than 1500 members. The Illuminati are possibly 1% to 2% of the population in the US.
What this means is that 99% of the people you know and work with are NOT Illuminati. They are good, hard working people (at least most are) who want a paycheck, and a good family life.
MOST of the leaders in our communities and financial systems have never heard of the Illuminati, because they are a minority.
So, why worry about them? Because a small group of evil people can do great damage. I will use an analogy.
MOST people in our society are not involved in child pornography, consider it a crime against children, and would fight against it given the chance.
Yet, the small minority of those involved in it do incalculable damage to the children involved. The effects of the crime are greater than the bare numbers involved.
Why isn’t child pornography stopped? We have the evidence, law enforcement knows it exists, yet it is a multi-billion dollar industry.
HOW do these people “hide” from justice and capture? Why don’t the police stop them? Because they aren’t stupid.
They work under secrecy. They change locations frequently, and kill those who talk to law enforcement. Bribes and other means are used to cover their tracks, and they hire excellent lawyers.
Okay, now lets look at the Illuminists. The 1% of our nation involved are extremely intelligent. They have sworn an oath on pain of death from toddlerhood on to never reveal their true allegiance to outsiders.
1. They are arrogant, and this could be their downfall. They view the common man as “sheep” with no intelligence.
They are full of pride, believe they are invulnerable… and that any press about them is the equivalent of a gnat to be swatted.
Arrogant people make mistakes, and they are becoming more blatant and open in recent years.
2. They believe they can overcome God, which is a huge mistake. God can stay the hand of history, and has so far, in the hope that more from this group will get out, because He is merciful.
3. Most of them are wounded, abused victims, who don’t realize that it is possible to leave the group.
There is a lot of discontent in the ranks, and there would be a mass exodus if the members believed it were really possible to get out (and live).
Many of the trainers I knew (I know, wicked, torturing pedophiles) were NOT happy with what they did.
They would whisper quietly, or give a look, to show that they disagreed with what they had to do. They would resignedly do their jobs, in the hope of advancement.
Know what one of the biggest carrots offered to those who advance up in the group is? That you don’t have to hurt people anymore, and that you can’t be abused.
(It’s true: only those higher than you in the group can abuse you, so everyone wants to move up, where the pool of candidates becomes smaller).
Of course, people can choose to abuse anyone beneath them, and that motivates some (but not all!) to move up.
Even with everything Svali revealed publicly – of which the above is just a very small sample – I still felt there were some unanswered questions.
As a direct result of our negotiations to get her on the radio, she indicated a willingness to answer my personal questions. This is the first time I have ever made those results public.
I will be the first to acknowledge that her answers are controversial. They imply that black magic is being used in the group, and that tangible results are apparently being obtained at times.
These visions and experiences could be the result of drug-induced hallucinations, which can be shared – based on my research in The Source Field Investigations.
In the interest of full disclosure, I will not censor anything she said.
—–Original Message—–
From: Svali
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 1:54 PM
To: David Wilcock
Subject: to David from svali
I promised to answer some questions, and so will now. Also, I did contact Greg, and he will be interviewing me this Wednesday.
This is the second of only two radio interviews I have ever granted. But both you, and a long-time friend have vouched for him, so I will do this.
WILCOCK: You have said there are six branches of study in the Illuminati, and different members specialize in different areas, depending on their proclivities.
Three of them are easy to figure out: Military, Media and Leadership. The other three, “Scholarship,” “Sciences” and “Spiritual”, seem to be very difficult to pinpoint.
If you could give a more detailed description, by category, of what each branch does, that would be very useful to people trying to really understand this.
SVALI: Sciences was involved in overseeing the areas of scientific study and research, including behavioural science, brain mapping, experimental drugs, [hypnotic] induction techniques, and how to implement training more quickly and reliably.
They truly do follow the “scientific method”, and have numerous national and international research protocols.
The top trainers and scientists in the group are heavily involved in this branch. Also children undergo at least some training in sciences; but the ones with a real aptitude and the right intelligence are directed here.
Those in sciences hold regular (yearly) conferences, to teach others, and in fact, teaching new techniques and disseminating the results of recent research are quite important.
Sciences also oversees such things as ensuring that training protocols based upon observation are followed, and that those involved in training and research are skilled in observing and recording changes in physiology, behaviour and stress patterns.
Sciences can include observing children behind a one-way mirror and observing normal patterns, as well as patterns when an external stimulus or change is introduced.
It may also involve monitoring how well an individual is coping with being “tanked” (placed in an isolation tank), to ensure that they aren’t over-stressed.
SVALI: Scholarship is heavily involved in the oral teaching of family history; in the research and passing down of genealogy, and the study of new learning.
Languages, including learning ancient languages, goes under this branch.
More recently, training in computer science and hacking has gone under scholarship (yes, they have very, very skillful hackers).
If a tradition, oral history, or story is important to the group, it will go under scholarship.
Those heavily involved in this area are outstanding teachers, and will supplement the teaching with dramatization of the history being taught.
They are also skilled at testing knowledge.
SVALI: Spiritual is the branch of the group involved in spiritual enlightenment. Again, while all members undergo training in this area, those especially skilled are selected to specialize in this.
Spiritual covers the following:
– intense mentoring by one’s spiritual mentor, a person skilled in this area;
– the ability to travel dimensions and through time, psychically travel (“out of body”);
– strength in power battles;
– the ability to wound or kill others psychically, and other paranormal phenomena.
Training in spiritual can include being tortured, and then passing to another dimension and reporting what one sees there.
Spiritual may also involve a visit to StoneHenge (yes, it really is a spiritual place for the group), going through a ceremony, and going through a portal back in time.
This training may also feature a chess game with a “chess master” with pieces that animate on the board, demonically.
Strange sounding stuff, to say the least, but this is what spiritual does. They are also in charge of rituals, or what is sometimes referred to as “slicing and dicing” by those who are not in spiritual.
WILCOCK: Also if you could spell out in detail what these 12 steps of so-called enlightenment are, that would also be beneficial in helping to track how you say some Hollywood films try to teach it.
People might also see that it was not something you would have invented off the top of your head because it is probably quite comprehensive, albeit confused and distorted because of what it obviously leads to.
SVALI: In my book, “Breaking the Chain”, I outline these. [Here is a current link to it on the website containing her material.]
Basically, the goal of these steps is the ultimate goal of enlightenment: to become a god. The Illuminati believe that the truly enlightened, at the top of the journey, become a god — they really do.
This is the aim of all the pain, torment, and training for these people.
And some of the top trainers (such as Mengele, and others I knew) had parts inside that really did believe they were a “god”, and insisted on being addressed as so.
SVALI: The first three steps involve abandonment, not wanting and not needing, or a breaking away from physical needs.
The child is conditioned to [1] never ask, [2] never want, and [3] never need through horrific experiences and teaching sessions.
These are designed to break down their will and sense of self; and teach them to look to external people for cues as to what they should want.
SVALI: The next three steps involve a breaking away from emotional relationship with others.
[4] To hurt is love; [5] to care brings pain, and at step six, [6] betrayal is the greatest good.
The child is taught to rely first and foremost upon themselves, and to never trust another.
A lot of spiritual training is also put in at this point. For instance, the child will have a trusted spiritual mentor, who has been a patient teacher for years.
Suddenly, the mentor turns on the child, and tries to kill them psychically, forcing the child to call on their own psychic protector (demon) to save their life.
If the child fails the test, they may die or be wounded terribly, and take months to recover.
Those who pass are able to fight their mentor and maintain, but at great spiritual cost, since protectors always take their “pound of flesh” emotionally and spiritually in return for sparing a child’s life (they don’t do this out of kindness).
SVALI: The next three steps instill deep loyalty (7-9), with the directives to [7] never disobey, [8] never question and to [9] protect the triad (the three adults the child is enmeshed with through a trauma bond).
This is the point where most of the assassin training is put in as well, and also suicide programming.
(For example: the child is given the command to suicide by their trainer. They must actually be falling down onto a knife to pass this test. The trainer and two assistants stop the child before they can succeed).
I am sorry if this is upsetting for you to read. Some people will have no trouble with it. Others will be feeling extremely saddened, terrified and depressed at this point. I do understand that.
These overwhelming emotions have served very well in stopping us from studying and understanding the problem on any widespread level – but unless we know what’s going on, we cannot expect it to stop.
As you can see, these “stages of enlightenment” are nothing more than horrific abuse and trauma, leading to a fully suicidal personality. Such trauma also makes a person capable of committing murder.
Svali later clarified, in a short letter, that the last three stages are different, depending upon which branch the child has chosen and / or has been selected for.
Each branch has different requirements for leadership. Many children are unable to move past even the ninth stage – where they protect the lives of their abusers over their own.
The farther a child can go through these last three stages, the higher and more influential they will become in the Order – and in the public eye, particularly in Leadership, Media and Military.
Leadership graduates may become politicians, church leaders, judges or heads of corporations, for example.
Media graduates may end up as visible actors on television and film, news journalists or career musicians – though not all of them will work in the public eye.
Military graduates may end up with commanding positions for national defense in their native country, but may also work behind the scenes – such as for defense contractors.
SVALI: 10-12 are steps of leadership; at the end of level 12, the child will have received their diamond. [This is a ring worn in ceremonies to connote high rank.]
Examples at one step are military leadership, with lessons taught such as, “If one member of the group is holding the others back, and it places your unit in danger, get rid of them (and they don’t mean send the person home)”.
At this point, the child will have shown their area of expertise, and is considered an adult within the group after passing the highest level they will achieve (not all children go to level 12; some go to level 9, 10, or 11).
I hope this is helpful.
Best wishes,
Many people don’t see how it would be possible for a group like this to function with such secrecy in the course of people’s daily lives.
Svali’s key article explaining how, when and where this group meets is “A Day in the Life of a Trainer.” Here are some of the highlights:
9:30 I get ready to go to bed. I have to get ten to twelve hours of sleep a night, or I am completely exhausted. Many times, I fall asleep reading to my two children.
Just before falling asleep, I say to my husband, “Remember” and give him the code that lets us know we have to wake up later….
1:00 am. My husband wakes me up. He and I take turns being the one to wake up the others. We don’t need an alarm, because our internal body clocks wake us up. I am in my sweats, I fell asleep dressed to make it easier when I rise in the middle of the night….
“Get the kids,” he says in a low tone. I go upstairs and tell them, “Get ready, now.”
They are up instantly, completely obedient which is very different from during the day. Quickly, silently they put their shoes on and I take them down to the car.
My husband drives, I am in the passenger seat. He drives with the headlights off until we are on the road so we won’t wake our neighbors up….
1:20 am We are at the first checkpoint at the military base. We drove in the back entrance and are waved through, the lookouts recognize our car and our license plates. They would stop anyone who wasn’t familiar or authorized to be there.
We will pass two more checkpoints before coming to the meeting area. It is at a large field on a major marine base that includes hundreds of acres.
Small tents are erected, and temporary bases set up for the night’s exercises. We come either here, or to one of three different meeting places, three times a week.
People are chatting and drinking coffee. There are a lot of friendships here, because everyone is working towards the same goal. The work is intense and the friendships are just as intense….
I go to the tent to change into my uniform. We all wear uniforms at night, and we all have ranks too, based on how high we are in the group and how well we do….
1:45 am We start going to our assigned tasks….
3:30 We have changed out of our uniforms, which are placed in a special hamper to be cleaned. My clothes, which were neatly folded on a shelf are back on, and we are all in the car on the way home….
4:00 am We are home and collapse into bed, instantly asleep….
7:00 am I wake up to the alarm, tired. It seems I am always tired, and this morning I have a slight headache. I hurry to get the kids up and get ready to teach another day.
As you can see from Svali’s testimony, they have meetings two or three times a week.
The three most frequent locations for meetings would be military bases, private estates and Masonic lodges, though some meetings are apparently held in churches as well.
On those nights, a member’s first sleep cycle will be almost three and a half hours, from 9:30-9:45 until 1AM. Then three more hours of sleep occur between 4AM and 7AM, adding up to a total of six.
This is how the members of this group can have a sustainable lifestyle – though the traumas they go through obviously are a major cause of the constant fatigue Svali reported having.
Each meeting allows for 10-15 minutes of social time at the beginning, and over and hour and a half of focused work in their chosen area of specialty.
If there are three meetings a week, that allows for over four and a half hours of highly specialized training per week: 18 hours a month and 216 hours a year.
Svali also said that some of these meetings are specifically ceremonial in nature – such as re-enactments of historical events. These ceremonies would help to increase a sense of group cohesiveness.
You can certainly read more about all this if you like, but I have made an effort to trim out the discussions of abuse and trauma so you can more easily understand how this works.
I have asked Svali and other insiders if I inadvertently stumbled over a “ritual site” back in 1990, in Scotia, New York – and they said it probably was.
Let me say, up front, that I do not believe the vast majority of Masons have any knowledge of these activities, nor anything to do with them. I feel it would be grossly unfair to blame them for this.
Approximately one mile away from a Masonic lodge in my home town of Scotia, New York, just east of Collins Lake, Sunnyside Avenue became a bridge that crossed over railroad tracks.
In 1990, a friend of mine was riding his motorcycle under this bridge when he saw something truly terrifying. He rushed over to my house and told me I had to come see it right away.
He wouldn’t say more.
I went there with him and was shocked by what I saw. It was a gigantic, Egyptian Left Eye of Horus – the classic Illuminati symbol – painted in full colors — bright red, bright blue, bright yellow, jet-black and white — under the bridge.
The spots of dirt on the Eye are my footprints from the day before. The Eye is about 40 feet wide.
The paint was very fresh, colorful and crisp in 1990. There was no other graffiti in the area. Not a single thing other than this Eye. No other designs. No scribbles. Nothing. Just the Eye.
I was surprised at how little it had degraded, overall, when I went back to photograph it in 2004. There was a lot of new graffiti, but nothing else even came close to the Eye in the quality of its execution.
Admittedly I was terrified to go there and do this, but I did it anyway.
In this next image, I used simple Transform filters in Photoshop to get the Eye looking the way it did when it was originally drawn – before they drafted it all out as a mural, using the bricks as a grid.
What I found even more troubling was that when I returned there in summer 2004, I found extremely hateful, and in some cases satanic graffiti – particularly under the opposite side of the bridge.
Jews and African-Americans were specifically targeted. Swastikas were drawn, as well as other symbols I could not identify. Here is one of the (believe it or not) less-offensive but nonetheless all-inclusive examples.
I went back a third time in winter 2004 and captured video film of this and much more of what was under there. I drive directly from the Masonic Lodge, around the corner, down the street, park in the lot, walk to the bridge, go under the bridge and see this.
My friend and I both felt an oppressive sense of evil when we were there in 1990. We realized that people could do ceremonies under this bridge and be undetected. There was a huge parking area nearby.
Back at the time we had no idea that there would be a connection between Egyptian symbols and black magic rituals – but why else would someone paint this huge, utterly perfect Eye, and not one other thing?
It was also strange to go back in 2004 and see that someone had repainted the Eye any time other graffiti was placed over it — such as the “tags” of whomever called himself “M-Side.”
Paint seems to degrade very fast on concrete, particularly in cold climates. Graffiti I see on a regular walk I take has already faded almost to invisibility in less than a year. It would appear the Eye has enjoyed regular upkeep and maintenance since I first saw it.
I really didn’t understand what I saw, or how it all fit together, until I read Still’s book in December 1996 – and particularly after reading Svali, beginning in 2001.
As I read Svali, I also felt like I finally had an explanation for something my parents saw one night, when I was maybe seven years old, that utterly terrified them with supernatural dread.
The house across the street from us was owned by a successful local car dealer. At the far south end of our street lived a family that owned a local oil company, a local bank, and also won positions in local elections.
In the middle of the night, my parents watched at least three different couples walk down the street and enter the house across the way from us.
There were no lights on outside or inside the house. They did not knock – they just opened the door and walked in. They walked almost like a military march – no talking, no gesturing, just very stiff.
My father was completely terrified and told us never to say anything to anyone about this. Neither of my parents like it when I ask them to tell me the story – and it’s always the same after all these years.
At least one of the couples they saw was Masonic. Mr. W was an elderly member of the Masons. His wife was a member of Eastern Star, the female version of Masonry.
We had at least three elderly male Masons living on our street – the Ws, the Fs and the Ms – all within no more than four houses’ distance from the one across from us. These were probably the people they saw.
The Ms were an Italian family that owned a local shoe repair shop. I wondered if there was a mafia connection, as periodically they would host large parties where lots of cigars were smoked.
Down the north end of the street, we had a group of guys stand in formation, wear kilts and play bagpipes every year. This would happen for one or two days. They were rehearsing for a local parade.
Both of these things really happened to me as a kid. What my parents saw was very real. The eye under the bridge was very real. Later on, all this research helped me put the pieces together.
You may be having a very strongly negative reaction as the full scope of this investigation becomes clear. You may feel too sick to keep reading, but you still want to. I do understand that.
That Eye really freaked me out when I was a high school student. It was way too perfect to have been done for no reason.
When I read Svali’s materials in the summer of 2001, I felt like the world was closing in on me. I had trouble sleeping and I felt a continuing sense of dread and anxiety.
Unlike many people, I did not have reactions of denial, ridicule, sarcasm and hatred. I had too much of a background – too much education – to fall into that trap.
The only way I could read about all of this was to take it in small doses, which I would then balance out with reading positive, uplifting inspirational material.
It took months for me to work through the grief, fear and disgust that came up for me as I learned about all of this. I have since become vastly more confident in a positive outcome.
This is our planet. This is who we have living here. This is the situation. I do believe in positive, angelic forces guiding and protecting our planet – and I also believe they need our help.
One of the strongest inspirations I saw in Svali’s testimony was the fact that the vast majority of these people don’t like what is happening to them, and would get out and help the world if they could.
The same thing happened during the Anti-Masonic Revolt of 1826 to circa 1840.
When I read Svali, I had seven years of studying and integrating Finney’s book into my daily thoughts, and five years to take in the much bigger picture of the history and goals of the “Illuminati” revealed in Still’s book.
I was stunned by the degree to which Svali’s testimony validated these provable, historical facts. Furthermore, there was plenty of evidence in the present world that such a group did exist.
This included a wide variety of movies that I would have never shown any interest in watching – but once I knew what to look for, I considered this to be a necessary form of research.
I did not want to publish my findings about all of this on my own website, under my own name, at the time, though I have since lost that fear.
On July 27, 2003 I briefly took on the pseudonym “Art Aqua” and published a comprehensive investigation of Svali and various corollary materials on Joe Mason and Dee Finney’s website
I wrote about the Eye, but I couldn’t remember where it was at the time – and didn’t have pictures. I retraced my footsteps on a trip to New York the following summer and found it.
Certain Hollywood films provide excellent proof to validate Svali’s testimony once you know what you are looking for. In many, many cases, the agendas of this group are being presented in these movies.
There have obviously been others since 2003 – but I largely abandoned this ‘research’ practice as it was emotionally disruptive. Each time I saw one I was vividly reminded of how real this all is.
Three films that actually exposed the group’s agenda – albeit in a very creepy and disturbing way – were David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive, Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut and The Skulls.
Two of the most popular film series of all time directly expose their agenda in thinly-veiled symbolism, thus helping to ensure their defeat: The Lord of the Rings series and the Star Wars series.
Additional expose’ films include Dr. Strangelove, The Parallax View, and both versions of The Manchurian Candidate.
Other than many obvious examples of horror films, the movies I saw that seemed to most directly promote this group’s agenda, as I discussed in detail, are:
The Lawnmower Man, Independence Day, Starship Troopers, Total Recall, Fight Club, The Cell, The Devil’s Advocate, The Game, Conspiracy Theory, A Beautiful Mind, Signs, X-Men I and II, The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, Face/Off, Tomb Raider, The Core, DareDevil, Hulk and Terminator III.
I apologize to M. Night Shyamalayan for having included “Signs” in this list, as I do not believe he is a member of this group – only that they liked his concept.
Since 2003, there have been other blatant examples. I was stunned when I watched Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, as the treatment of Gary Oldman’s character “Sirius Black” seemed to precisely mirror how Svali says this group sees Lucifer.
The power battles against “Dementors” in that movie were quite disturbing for a children’s movie as well. In the series finale, Harry has to let Voldemort kill him in order to “win” – another common theme.
Batman Begins and The Dark Knight Rises are both loaded with obvious correlations once you’ve familiarized yourself with Svali’s material. The villains are used to reveal the group’s agenda.
A Series of Unfortunate Events is one of the most blatant examples of all time – almost like a love letter from the group to its own children. The All-Seeing Eye appears constantly in this movie.
The Golden Compass was a big-budget flop that is thoroughly loaded with symbolism and programming.
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, Heath Ledger’s last film before his drug overdose, is an extremely obvious example – and reveals that the group knows they are losing, and desperately need a pep talk.
Inception is so closely related to the “training” Svali discusses that it would seem its ultimate creators must have been fans of her website – and / or that she is telling us the truth.
I went back and watched Dark City upon recommendation, and this also had many correlations. ExistenZ is another older (1999) example that seems heavily influenced by the group. Be warned that both of these films are difficult and disturbing to watch, although ExistenZ is also corny and lacks believability.
Hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people are now investigating this subject and looking for examples. Certain music videos are quite blatant as well as certain video games.
You have probably seen at least a few of the movies I’ve just mentioned. Now that I’m finally giving you all the pieces I’ve been putting together, you may very well be feeling overwhelmed.
That’s exactly what they want.
Denial is their first line of defense – creating a sarcastic disbelief in which people boost their ego by convincing themselves this is all a joke, and then attacking and humiliating anyone discussing it.
Their next line of defense is fear. The people within this group do literally believe that if you fear them, you worship them. They see fear and worship as interchangeable.
There are many, many people who begin acquiring knowledge about this group, but then conclude it is completely hopeless for anyone to stand up to them.
I do not fear them. I published this all at once for my own protection. We had hundreds of letters asking me when this would be finished, but for my own safety it was important that it all come out at once.
I understand we have a very serious problem – and I have now had contact with a massive 122-nation alliance that has formed to solve it.
Particularly since 9/11, a majority of the active and retired United States military has become completely aware of this group, its agendas and ultimate intentions – and apparently intends to stop them.
Fulford’s Pentagon sources assert that we will soon see mass arrests. There may be a public unveiling of evidence like what I have presented. This “history lesson” may soon become common knowledge.
There is a historical precedent for what could be about to happen now.
180 years ago the Anti-Masonic Revolt was in full swing. A staggering 45,000 out of 50,000 Masons fled the group once they realized they could. Masonry was nearly destroyed in America as a result.
These people had taken their oaths. They were well aware of the secrecy, preferential treatment and loyalty they had sworn to uphold – upon pain of death.
Nonetheless, after this happened they became some of America’s strongest and bravest allies.
Using this written history as our guide, let’s again remember what Svali said:
3. Most of them are wounded, abused victims, who don’t realize that it is possible to leave the group.
There is a lot of discontent in the ranks, and there would be a mass exodus if the members believed it were really possible to get out (and live).
Many of the trainers I knew (I know, wicked, torturing pedophiles) were NOT happy with what they did.
They would whisper quietly, or give a look, to show that they disagreed with what they had to do.
There is an incredibly vast amount of material about the Illuminati on the Internet. Much of it is of very poor and unconvincing quality.
The overwhelming majority of these articles are loaded with anger, victimhood and the witch-burning mentality. I hardly ever see any acknowledgement of the humanity of the people stuck in these groups.
I believe this “projected” anger happens when we cannot face our own shadow side – the pain, humiliation and sense of inadequacy and defeat that goes back to early childhood, when we first heard the word “NO”.
This buried shame can lead to the use of alcohol and drugs to numb it out, as well as many other addictive and compulsive behaviors.
Unhealed pain creates a ‘victim’ mentality, in which we are constantly searching for an external enemy to blast with our repressed rage. We project this rage onto a convenient, easy target.
If we can blame someone for why we feel bad, then for a short time we feel better.
If we haven’t forgiven and accepted ourselves, and those who hurt us, and stepped into a true knowing of our own value, we will keep seeking revenge over and over again.
This is nothing short of an epidemic in our society. Just look at the comments on any YouTube video as an obvious example.
The “Internet Conspiracy Theorists” channel this repressed rage and self-loathing into a mythical scenario that is extremely destructive to individuals, groups and nations.
Many of them seem utterly incapable of healing, or even realizing what they’re doing.
In this scenario, it becomes black and white. God Versus Satan. People versus Things. Good Guys versus Bad Guys. Us Versus Them.
Look at what happens when you think like this. Everyone in the government is the enemy. Everyone in the military is the enemy. Everyone in a corporation is the enemy. Everyone in the media is the enemy.
Our warriors have pledged their lives to protect us. That is a truly valiant sacrifice. Our own fathers and brothers paid the ultimate price for our freedom — with their blood.
I will not dishonor the brave men and women of our armed forces by suggesting, for even one minute, that “they are all in on it.”
Some of them are. Absolutely. But most of them are not. They have chosen to risk torture and potentially sacrifice their lives to protect the will, the freedom, the safety and the lives of the people.
They have not chosen to increase the comforts of a small group of wealthy bankers.
Anyone who works inside or outside the system, and chooses to stand and fight, has become a soldier for Truth — protecting the people who are still half-“asleep” and cowering in fear.
We have a word for those who stand and fight to protect and defend others. They are called heroes.
One of the most heroic exposures of Truth, paving the way for much more that will follow, aired on CNN in January, 2010. Videos of this stunning expose are still available.
I have transcribed this clip in case it should ever be taken offline, as the information is too important to ignore. It features an interview between Anderson Cooper and Republican senator Charles Grassley.
This expose’ could not have come about without the coordinated, heroic efforts of military, media and governmental officials. I first wrote about it here, in 2010.
ANDERSON COOPER: Keeping them honest tonight. Potentially hundreds of military employees and contractors who may have bought child pornography online, and haven’t been prosecuted or in some cases even investigated.
That’s right, you heard me. Child pornography. As many as 1700 names, according to a US Senator, on a list of 5200 from an Internet sting operation – overlooked the first time around, four years ago.
Only now are they supposedly getting a second look, and only after pressure from investigative reporters and the US Senator you are about to hear from – Republican Charles Grassley.
The Pentagon porn story began in 2006. An immigration and customs enforcement child pornography sting operation called Project Flicker produced payment records of about 5200 people – many of whom provided Army or fleet zip codes, or military email addresses.
Subsequently, the Pentagon’s investigative branch, DCIS, began going through the ice list to identify who actually was a DOD employee or a contractor.
The investigation, however, only ran for eight months – and only cross-checked some 3500 names for Pentagon ties, according to the senator.
According to DCIS documents, revealed in a Freedom of Information Act request, out of that 3500, investigators uncovered 264 employees or contractors – including staffers for the Secretary of Defense and contractors at the NSA.
Nine people had top security clearances. But only about 20 percent of those 264 people were completely investigated. Fewer still were prosecuted, and after about eight months, the entire probe was halted.
It left about 1700 names totally unchecked. 1700 alleged kiddie porn customers – an unknown number of whom may still work in some capacity for the Defense Department.
Late last summer, after investigations by the Boston Globe and Yahoo News revealed the figures, a Pentagon spokesman promised to re-open the investigation, conceding that DCIS had stopped due to lack of resources.
DCIS says it is now revisiting all 5200 names, telling Senator Grassley’s staff they have now identified 302 employees or staffers. The Pentagon’s IG telling us, quote,
“Any suggestion that the D.O.D. Office of Inspector General or its criminal investigative arm, the DCIS, is not taking Operation Flicker and the issue of child pornography seriously is in error.”
Senator Grassley says he is still not getting the cooperation he needs from the Pentagon. I spoke to him earlier…. [snip]
AC: One of your staffers told us that getting information from the Defense Department on this has been like pulling teeth. Is that how you’d describe it?
SG: I’ve been involved in oversight of the Defense Department for almost all the years I’ve been in the United States senate.
It is very difficult to get answers from a lot of bureaucracies, but it’s quite more difficult in the Defense Department.
AC: Senator Grassley, I appreciate your time. We will continue to follow this. Thank you.
What you are seeing here is the result of two warring factions in the Pentagon. The minority “Illuminati” loyal faction still enjoys an institutionalized cover-up that protects certain members from being prosecuted.
Based on firsthand witnesses leaking intel to former Forbes editor Benjamin Fulford, we have every reason to believe that the majority of the Pentagon, and the military, are fully aware of this problem.
They have listened to the will of the people – particularly since 9/11 – and they intend to do their job to protect the people… and save our planet from a plan that very few people really want.
If the rumors Fulford is hearing are correct, such an operation would have required an extraordinary degree of international cooperation and secrecy – and stunningly deep espionage.
Pentagon sources have said the trillion-dollar lawsuit I have reported on, and will cover again here, is one of several key strategies to make us aware of the urgent need for these mass arrests.
The group must be tackled by strictly legal means, so there is no possibility of confusion. Then, in the ensuing investigation, many other suppressed truths will emerge.
Cell phone and Internet service will nearly grind to a halt if / when something like this happens. Twitter and Facebook will overload and crash. It will be much bigger than 9/11 in scope.
Undoubtedly, many people will believe this is a worldwide military coup, and be terrified by it.
Nonetheless, I feel confident that they wouldn’t do this unless they had information that will leave little doubt of the need for action – and for why it had to be done.
I am not in denial. Neither should you be. Facts are facts. This group exists. The media can’t talk about it without being killed. A coalition of the willing is increasingly rising up to defeat Financial Tyranny.
By writing this and setting it free to the Internet, I have done my part. I have never seen any other presentation of this data all in one place, with the full sensitivity to the history involved.
I have no involvement in this possible military operation other than to have written this investigation — to help pave the way for the major changes and the complete honesty and truth-telling that is required.
I do not believe we will be ‘rescued’ by UFOs, ETs, angels or otherwise. While I do admittedly believe in such things, I also feel that this is our problem – and we are the ones who have to solve it.
In this sense, the military would merely become the instrument for the will of the people. We have said what we want, on a massive level.
We may never be able to predict how this change will occur, but I do believe events are now reaching a critical mass. Powerful alliances and opposing factions are closing in on this group from all sides.
I will now cover some additional, critical evidence before we head into a discussion of the lawsuit itself, and present the back-story and supporting material that I have only recently been made aware of.
This will be the last of the material that is upsetting to read. It is important to understand that the Penn State trial is only a brief glimmer into the world of organized pedophilia – and it must be stopped.
If you go to, you will find the official website of the North American Man-Boy Love Association. Seriously.
Just the name sounds like the punch line of a joke – and Season Four, Episode Six of South Park, “Cartman Joins NAMBLA,” was devoted to it.
I feel this episode is crude and insensitive, as are almost all of them – yet humor was used to expose a very real problem.
Most of the people watching this episode had no idea that NAMBLA is a real organization – and are disturbed if and when they find out the truth.
The NAMBLA logo features an offset, capital M and a lower-case B. Any image or video file will have a certain number of “megabytes” on a computer.
Megabytes are also delineated as Mb – the “Man-Boy” within the NAMBLA logo.
Therefore, the NAMBLA logo implies that by becoming a member of this group, you will have access to the same “Man-Boy” materials Anderson Cooper and Senator Grassley said were being downloaded by various members of the Department of Defense.
Since NAMBLA receives hardly any media coverage whatsoever, I have found that even very open-minded, clear-thinking people have a hard time believing me when I tell them about it.
Yet, you can go to their website yourself and see how extensive it is. This excerpt says it all:
WELCOME!  The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) was formed in 1978….
NAMBLA is strongly opposed to age-of-consent laws and all other restrictions which deny men and boys the full enjoyment of their bodies and control over their own lives….
We call for fundamental reform of the laws regarding relations between youths and adults….
We provide factual information and help educate society about the positive and beneficial nature of man/boy love. 
Other parts of the NAMBLA website feature graphic fantasy descriptions of erotic encounters between men and boys, clearly intended to help pedophiles get “in the mood.”
Again: just as Svali said, this is right out in the open – but no one seems to be paying attention.
The “good guys” in the FBI created a long-term sting operation against NAMBLA – thanks to the work of Bob Hamer, a 30-year veteran operative who spent three years infiltrating the organization.
A 1995 FBI investigation revealed NAMBLA had 1,100 registered members. The article featuring this information appears to be blocked – I had to leave it up on my browser for hours before it loaded.
Agent Bob Hamer ultimately wrote The Last Undercover – The True Story of an FBI Agent’s Dangerous Dance with Evil, a groundbreaking book about his investigation.
This book is currently available for free download here. Please donate or buy the hardcover version to support Hamer’s work.
As this next video shows, Hamer discovered that this group was primarily focused on coordinating efforts to find and have sex with boys – not as the legal lobbying group it claimed to be.
Unfortunately, Hamer’s investigation did not go very far up the ladder – but the Franklin Cover-Up revealed much more, thanks in part to the testimony of Paul Bonacci, a child NAMBLA victim.
The original book investigating these issues, The Franklin Cover-Up, features graphic descriptions of ritual abuse and murder similar to what you find in some of Svali’s materials – which I did not publish here.
The author, a 16-year senator from Nebraska, tells his story in the documentary A Conspiracy of Silence, which got pulled from Discovery Channel before airing in 1994 – but is now widely available on YouTube.
More recently, Nick Bryant wrote The Frankin Scandal – and substantially added to the scope and the amount of provable data in this investigation.
Bryant’s book is also written with much greater sensitivity to the reader – and does not provide the graphic depictions of abuse that make The Franklin Cover-Up so difficult to read.
This Amazon review of Bryant’s book by “Puzzlenomics” reveals the scope of what it contains.
I applaud Nick Bryant for bravely and selflessly investigating the inner workings of local, state, and federal officials to conceal the sexual terrorism, murder, and blackmail of many Nebraskan underage children by some of America’s most affluent, successful, and revered men in government, law enforcement, education, and clergy….
In this utterly disturbing work, Bryant deftly elucidates the confluence of the “real” powers within our taxpayer-funded government to craftily coordinate assets within key judicial, media, and law enforcement agencies to effect its will to suppress worldwide exposure of a possibly CIA-sponsored (blackmail) operation — pandering minors to some of the country’s most influential, affluent, and powerful men in business, media, and government.
This network of judges, policemen, lawyers, FBI agents, and media figures is so extensive, so deep, that the “powers” seemingly have an inexhaustible supply of “assets” ready to carry out their assigned tasks at a moment’s notice.
Paul Bonacci was directly involved in the Franklin cover-up, and is featured in the book. You can see part of Bonacci’s testimony about NAMBLA to FBI agent Ted Gunderson in this video.
In The Franklin Cover-Up, Bonacci claims that NAMBLA was used to coordinate child auctions.
229: The North American Man-Boy Love Association, or NAMBLA, figured prominently in what else Bonacci could recall.
The motto of NAMBLA is “Sex before eight, or it’s too late.” Bonacci reports… that he witnessed NAMBLA-organized auctions of children.
300: Paul Bonacci reports… trips on behalf of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), the pedophile group now given semi-official status by the United Nations.
Paul cites travel to the Netherlands and Germany carrying child pornography for subsequent “import” to the U.S.A. to avoid prosecution.
In Amsterdam, he names “Charles Hester,” and the British “Tommie Carter,” who had on computer a global list of child pornography users. NAMBLA is also cited for organizing auctions of children.

It is a misnomer to think that most of these children are being snatched off the street. If parents have their children take normal precautions outdoors, they should be fine.
The evidence does not support paranoid assertions that most missing children were dragged into pedophile rings that may be organized by groups like NAMBLA.
The reality is that many of these kids were sexually abused by their parents first, and the parents were offered freedom in exchange for allowing their children to participate in “medical experiments.”
Many, if not most of the kids involved in this are from within the group itself, or “sister groups” that work with the Illuminati. Some kids are specifically trained to specialize in this kind of work.
I am not at all trying to cover for this group. Nor does this in any way undermine the seriousness of what is going on, or of the need for it to be stopped immediately.
I just do not want loving parents to be living in constant fear when the odds are extremely small that anything like this would happen to their children.
Regardless of what you may think about FOX, they have very bravely carried this and other shocking and important stories — and for that they deserve credit.
In December 2011, three new witnesses joined the team of former child actors claiming they were repeatedly sexually abused in the film and television industry – going back to the 1950s.
If a spate of recent allegations proves true, Hollywood may have a hideous epidemic on its hands. The past two weeks have brought three separate reports of alleged child sexual abuse in the entertainment industry….
Revelations of this sort come as no surprise to former child star Corey Feldman.
Feldman, 40, himself a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, unflinchingly warned of the world of pedophiles who are drawn to the entertainment industry last August.
“I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia,” Feldman told ABC’s Nightline. “That’s the biggest problem for children in this industry… It’s the big secret.”
Another child star from an earlier era agrees that Hollywood has long had a problem with pedophilia.
“When I watched that interview, a whole series of names and faces from my history went zooming through my head,” Paul Peterson, 66, star of The Donna Reed Show, a sitcom popular in the 1950s and 60s, and president of A Minor Consideration, tells
“Some of these people, who I know very well, are still in the game.”
“This has been going on for a very long time,” concurs former “Little House on the Prairie” star Alison Arngrim. “It was the gossip back in the ‘80s. People said, ‘Oh yeah, the Coreys, everyone’s had them.’ People talked about it like it was not a big deal.”
Arngrim, 49, was referring to Feldman and his co-star in “The Lost Boys,” Corey Haim, who died in March 2010 after years of drug abuse.
“I literally heard that they were ‘passed around,’” Arngrim  said. “The word was that they were given drugs and being used for sex.
It was awful – these were kids, they weren’t 18 yet. There were all sorts of stories about everyone from their, quote, ‘set guardians’ on down that these two had been sexually abused and were totally being corrupted in every possible way.”…
Even though Feldman spoke candidly about the abuse, he hasn’t named the predator. “People don’t want to talk about this because they’re afraid for their careers,” says Peterson.
“From my perspective, what Corey did was pretty brave.
It would be really wonderful if his allegations reached through all of the protective layers and identified the real people who are a part of a worldwide child pornography ring, because it’s huge and it respects no borders, just as it does not respect the age of the children involved.”
Once the secrecy around this issue is broken – and I do believe that it will be – there will be a vast, unprecedented need for psychologists, counselors and social workers to provide effective treatment.
Whether you are a victim of abuse or you find yourself in a position to help survivors, there are resources available that will greatly assist you.
Another very useful classic that focuses in more specifically on the sexual abuse aspect is The Courage to Heal, by Ellen Bass and Laura Davis.
Svali’s own writings provide detailed information about how the “programming” is done, making it much easier to anticipate what could happen — and recognize it when it does.
This comment appears on the Franklin Cover-Up Amazon page, and was written by Jed Schlackman on August 5, 2003.
It’s interesting that former CIA director Bill Colby ambiguously acknowledged to the author that the scenario described is real, and not long thereafter Colby turned up dead under suspicious circumstances.
This comment by John Doe “JD” (NJ), on February 8, 2011, also spells out a typical reaction from someone who reads the book.
This makes Rosemary’s Baby and An Invitation to Hell look like bake sales. The scope of the crimes, people involved and lack of justice is overwhelming….
Chief of Police, District Judge, Senior Editor, Senator, President, Foster Care worker, FBI, is anyone in power not a raving lunatic?
Drugs, child pornography, prostitution, murder, embezzlement, satanism, all with the help of very powerful friends in Omaha and D.C.

This quote inidicates that former Rep. DeCamp welcomes anyone to sue him if they can disprove what he has written.
Comment by Emi (MD, USA) – December 25, 2007
Mr. Decamp so much as said that if anyone believes that he is lying, or being untruthful about ANYTHING he’s written in his book, then that person should just ‘go ahead and sue him’.
He wrote that, he in fact, “welcomes” any suits that anyone would like to bring against him challenging his honesty in what he’s written in this book….
Ultimately, Mr. Decamp concludes that the reason why this huge cover-up has gone on for so long, is because there are very prominent people who like where they are in the social hierarchy.
If this scandal were to reach the mainstream, then the whole “system” itself would collapse entirely, thus threatening the security of their position.
Knowing the penalty of lying in such a sensitive, controversial case, Rep. John DeCamp revealed the content of his conversations with former CIA director William Colby in the beginning of his book.
The “Larry King” being mentioned is not the former television news anchor, just to be clear.
Colby and his wife, Sally Shelton Colby, a United States ambassador under President Jimmy Carter, were at that very moment warning me to get away from the Franklin child abuse investigation, Larry King, and anybody else linked with Franklin, as quickly as possible for the sake of my own life and safety.
Sally and Bill had never talked to me like this before. They sat me down, made it clear that this was not one of our routine discussions about life and health and happiness, and emphasized to me the serious nature of what and whom I was dealing with.
“What you have to understand, John, is that sometimes there are forces and events too big, too powerful, with so much at stake for other people or institutions, that you cannot do anything about them, no matter how evil or wrong they are and no matter how dedicated or sincere you are or how much evidence you have.
That is simply one of the hard facts of life you have to face. You have done your part. You have tried to expose the evil and wrongdoing. It has hurt you terribly. But it has not killed you up to this point.
I am telling you, get out of this before it does.
Sometimes things are just too big for us to deal with, and we have to step aside and let history take its course. For you, John, this is one of those times,” Bill warned, with Sally nodding her head in affirmation….
“But Bill,” I argued, “somebody has to do something. The problem here is that our institutions of government have been corrupted.
If there is a cover-up — and I now absolutely believe there is, even though originally I thought this whole Franklin story had to be a fantasy — then that cover-up can only take place with the cooperation and even the active assistance of some of our key institutions of government, from the courts to the cops, from the highest politicians, to the media representatives, to the wealthiest business leaders of our community and country.
“I can’t believe what you are telling me, Bill. Are you saying I should just lay it down, and walk away from this, when I know kids are being abused and killed; when I know our most respected citizens and business leaders are up to their eyebrows in drug dealing and official corruption; when every bone in my body tells me that evil is triumphing and everybody who is anybody is scared beanless to do something about it, for fear of one thing or another?
How can any honest or intelligent person do this? If I, or someone like me, do not keep pursuing this, then who will? And if we quit now, then when, if ever, will the truth come out and something be done about this evil and this corruption?”….
“So, what’s the message?” I asked. “What are you trying to tell me?”
“Sometimes,” Bill said, “There are forces too powerful for us to whip them individually, in the time frame that we would like.
We have to keep working at our goal. But we have to be sensible enough, not to risk everything and get ourselves destroyed or killed in the process. That victory we seek may take much longer than we wanted, and come in ways we never anticipated.”
I believe that victory that Colby spoke of – and may have been killed for – is upon us now.
I also want to be clear in saying that not everyone in these insider groups is a pedophile. The problem is that some of them are – and the group as a whole is concealing their crimes.
Now we will turn our discussion back to subjects that are a lot easier to talk about – with a greater focus on the solutions that are now emerging.
This stunning Federal Reserve bailout figure of 26 trillion dollars, and other evidence like it, has directed the people’s wrath towards the financial industry… rather than the elected government.
Nothing like this has ever happened before.
Millions of people have taken to the streets in the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. It has pulled back due to cold weather, fatigue and threats of arrest, but is certainly far from over.
By October 10, 2011, the movement had spread to fully 900 different cities:
Occupy Wall Street, a movement that began as a small band of protesters in Zuccotti Park, gained endorsements from major unions and progressive leaders as well as prominent politicians.
Within a few short weeks, it has come to resemble a movement with more than 900 meetups in 900 cities across the country.
It has even gone international with Occupy sites in Australia and London and other cities saddled with long unemployment lines, gross income disparities, and hapless politicians.
I do believe the “1 percent” are scared out of their wits of a mass, public uprising. I believe there is clear evidence to prove it.
We’ve already seen Occupy Wall Street protestors gathering directly in front of the homes of key figures in financial and media corporations:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Occupy Wall Street is on the move … uptown.
Why uptown? Because that’s where the rich folks live!
Organizers are planning a march on Tuesday that will visit the homes of JP Morgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) CEO Jamie Dimon, billionaire David Koch, hedge fund honcho John Paulson, Howard Milstein, and News Corp (NWSA, Fortune 500) CEO Rupert Murdoch.
The millionaires and billionaires are being targeted for what event organizers called a “willingness to hoard wealth at the expense of the 99%.”
In desperation, the United States Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
If you don’t know what this is, you should. It is a declaration of war against the people of the United States by the insiders running their government:
Top experts – including the sponsors of the bill – say that the newly-passed National Defense Authorization Act authorizes indefinite detention of Americans living within the United States.
Top legal experts point out that the government claims the right to assassinate American citizens on U.S. soil without any charges, trial or other constitutional protection.
I noted last month that Congress was considering repealing prohibitions against torture. (I wrote to attorneys at the ACLU, but haven’t received word yet on whether such a provision has been enacted).
Obama Signs NDAA Into Law – But Won’t Detain Americans
Revised Bill Still Gives Obama Right to Lock Up Citizens

The members of Congress may be all under death threats, forcing them to sign the NDAA bill — despite it being political suicide to do so, as it gives permission for the US to lock up its own citizens, without a trial, and throw away the key — forever.
However, it was very clear that Obama did not want to sign it at all. He put in a “signing statement” that clearly contravened the underlying intent of the bill.
Obama Signs NDAA Bill Despite “Serious Reservations”
“I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists,” Obama said in the signing statement.
Presidents issue such statements when they feel a law conflicts with the executive’s constitutional powers. Obama criticized them during the Bush administration, but has found the practice useful on a handful of occasions.
In this case, Obama argued that the changes Congress made to the bill affirm only authorities that the Bush and Obama administrations have already claimed in fighting terrorism.
But he noted that the codification of those powers in law was unnecessary and perhaps harmful. And he insisted he would not use the powers to detain citizens without trial.
“I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens,” Obama wrote.
“Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation.
“My administration will interpret section 1021 [of the bill] in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.”
Civil liberties advocates like Romero pointed out that once the provisions are law, however, they will be available to a President Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney or any future president, who could choose to use the powers granted more aggressively.
“We are incredibly disappointed that President Obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court,” said Romero. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the war on terror was extinguished today.”

This article from Politics USA attempted to diminish the hysteria around this NDAA bill by explaining what this “signing statement” really means.
Others disagree with this, as we see — but the important point is that Obama did not blindly sign it. We can clearly see that there is an epic power struggle going on, right now, at the highest levels.
The trick was that this same NDAA bill is required to make sure the military receives funding. By withholding that, the country would have been completely and utterly defenseless — and that is an intolerable situation.
Obama’s Signing Statement Prevents NDAA From Applying to American Citizens
Those who believe that Obama should have vetoed the NDAA don’t seem to realize that what they are asking for is that the military go unfunded.
The NDAA is a yearly funding measure, and as such could be amended when a new, and hopefully saner Congress is sworn into session to remove the war on terror language that this Congress foolishly in a bit of near election year pandering passed.
Too many Democrats went along with supporting the NDAA, and those members of Congress along with their detention and torture loving GOP colleagues must be held accountable. I know that it is easier to blame the president for everything, because he is but one man, but the truth that we need to clean out and disinfect this Congress.
Yes, Obama signed the NDAA. Even if he would have vetoed it, an override would have been likely. His veto would have been nothing more than an empty symbolic gesture that would have caused more problems than it solved.
The NDAA does a lot of things, but the one thing it does not do is authorize the detention of American citizens. As we head into to 2012, can we finally put this bogus piece of misinformation to bed?

Obama’s signing statement wasn’t enough to satisfy many people. There is a growing paranoia online about the depth and severity of threat presented by this bill.
Even if Obama tried to avoid endorsing it, the underlying threat it represents is so severe that no one is happy about it at all.
NDAA Outrage Continues to Grow Online – January 5, 2012
This is day three of living in post-NDAA America.
In case you’ve been living under a particularly large and comfy rock, the NDAA is a radical and dangerous bill — which Barack Hussein Obama quietly signed into law on New Year’s Eve, while almost every American was preoccupied with New Year’s binge drinking.
(His administration had previously vowed to veto the NDAA, before strangely reversing course and signing it into law. He issued a signing statement saying his administration would not use the controversial indefinite detention provisions.
This promise, however, is not legally binding — and it also does not prevent future Presidents from detaining and torturing American citizens without the right to a trial or attorney, and without bringing formal charges against them.
The signing statement is the legal equivalent of a Post-it note affixed to a manuscript.)
How bad is this law, really? Here are some experts:
Presidential candidate Ron Paul on NDAA: “…bold and dangerous attempt to establish martial law in America.”
Rep. Justin Amash: NDAA was “carefully crafted to mislead the public.”
Amnesty International: “Provisions that were snuck into the bill with little notice from mainstream media could spell indefinite detention without a hearing, keep Guantanamo open, and hinder fair trials.”
And Americans, despite some pro-Obama spin to the contrary, are definitely targeted by NDAA’s indefinite detention provisions. As Salon columnist and constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald explained:
“Myth #3: U.S. citizens are exempted from this new bill: This is simply false, at least when expressed so definitively and without caveats. The bill is purposely muddled on this issue which is what is enabling the falsehood.”
The American broadcast media has been eerily silent on NDAA’s passage into law, despite the fact that foreign newspapers and broadcast networks have been covering this as one of their top international stories.
Yesterday, however, FOX News began to let NDAA mentions seep into their news coverage….
Jonathan Turley in The Guardian (UK): “President Barack Obama rang in the New Year by signing the NDAA law with its provision allowing him to indefinitely detain citizens.
It was a symbolic moment, to say the least. With Americans distracted with drinking and celebrating, Obama signed one of the greatest rollbacks of civil liberties in the history of our country … and citizens partied in unwitting bliss into the New Year.
Ironically, in addition to breaking his promise not to sign the law, Obama broke his promise on signing statements and attached a statement that he really does not want to detain citizens indefinitely.”
Petitions and online protests like this one, which call for the impeachment of Obama and recall of Senators who voted in favor of NDAA, are also beginning to appear.
This should be an interesting year. If you don’t see any future articles or tweets from me, you’ll know I’ve been relocated to the Guantanamo Beach Club.

In the midst of all these other things going on, I chuckled when I read this.
Still, after all these years, certain members of the British press are insinuating that the United States is an illegal country, and should still rightfully be a colony of Great Britain.
Is the US Declaration of Independence Illegal?
In another sign of imminent trouble, breakdown and chaos at the highest levels, the head of the New York Times resigned very suddenly and out of nowhere in December.
NY Times CEO Exiting, Without Explanation
Robinson, who steered the company through one of the harshest business environments it has ever faced, underscored the struggle her company faces during a presentation at the recent UBS investor conference in New York.
The Times Co gave no explanation for Robinson’s sudden departure, which caught analysts as well as company insiders by surprise.
Speculation among industry observers and the analyst community centered on the company’s faltering stock price, which has declined more than 80 percent since Robinson was appointed CEO in December 2004. This year alone, shares are down nearly 25 percent….
“It is very unusual to have a long-time CEO suddenly announce her leaving within two weeks with no replacement,” said Evercore Partners analyst Douglas Arthur….
Within the New York Times’ newsroom, word of the shakeup began to spread about 20 minutes before the announcement.
“No one had an inkling this was coming,” said a source at the paper, who declined to be named. “As recently as last week she was taking meetings with people and mapping out business plans for well into next year.”…

The Huffington Post has been quietly absorbing journalists who have broken away from The New York Times. It definitely appears that “HuffPo” is much less controlled than other, more traditional media outlets.
Mass “Defection” of NYT Reporters to HP
Times lawyers fired off a cease-and-desist letter to Arianna Huffington on Monday, claiming that The Huffington Post’s new blog, Parentlode, is a rip-off of the Times blog Motherlode and she better change the name or else.
Longtime Times writer and Motherlode founder Lisa Belkin decamped to The Huffington Post earlier this month and began writing for the new blog on Monday in a post titled, “Welcome to Parentlode.”…
In the last year, Times writers and editors like [Lisa] Belkin, Tim O’Brien, Peter Goodman and Tom Zeller have all jumped to The Huffington Post. In the spring, then executive editor Bill Keller dedicated part of a Times Magazine column to trashing HuffPo’s aggregating ways and its merger with AOL.

In addition to passing the NDAA bill, it appears that the Federal Reserve insiders’ cabal created “Tom Clancy’s Rainbow 6: Patriots” game as a form of propaganda.
In this game, the people who marched in the Occupy Wall Street movement are framed as if they are domestic terrorists — and should be hauled away into “detention camps” as the NDAA bill recommended.
An upcoming game in the Tom Clancy franchise is ruffling some feathers for depicting a domestic terrorist attack staged by individuals who sound sympathetic to the 99 Percent movement.
“Tom Clancy’s Rainbow 6: Patriots,” due out in 2013 for Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and PC, was teased in a recent trailer released by French publisher Ubisoft, which produced a clip wherein a collection of American mercenaries raid a corporate boardroom and murder the CEO.
“This all started when you became bigger than the governments,” a narrator’s voice explains. “And governments became bigger than the people. That’s how the land of the free became the kingdom of the few — a few like you, Mr. Walsh. It’s time for a new balance of power. You may not answer to the government, but you will answer to us.”
And like a scene from a Wall Street CEO’s worst nightmare, the captive is strapped with explosives and hurled from the skyscraper office down to the street below, where the bombs detonate seconds before he hits the pavement.
Conservative blogs have been rather appreciating how these fictional terrorists mirror the message of the 99 Percent movement, although it’s not yet clear what the characters’ true motivations are.

Even with the 26 to 29 Trillion dollars in bailouts we described earlier in this investigation, there is still such a great insolvency in the Western institutions that Obama was forced to ask for yet another bailout on December 27th.
It was an additional 1.2 Trillion — added to the “debt ceiling” of the United States.
Obama Asks for 1.2 Trillion-Dollar Bailout (Tuesday 12/27)

The approval is expected to go through without a challenge, given that Congress is in recess until later in January and the request is in line with an agreement to keep the U.S. government funded into 2013.
The debt is projected to fall within $100 billion of the current cap by December 30, when the United States has $82 billion in interest on its debt and payments such as Social Security coming due.
President Barack Obama is expected to ask for authority to increase the borrowing limit by $1.2 trillion, part of the spending authority that was negotiated between Congress and the White House this summer.
Under the agreement struck in August during the showdown over the government’s debt limit, the cap is automatically raised unless Congress votes to block the debt-ceiling extension.
Lawmakers have 15 days within receiving the request to vote, which is largely symbolic because the president can veto it and Congress would be unlikely to muster the two-thirds majority to override it. Moreover, the U.S. House of Representatives also is in recess until January 17.
The deal called for raising the debt ceiling by $2.1 trillion to serve the nation’s borrowing needs into 2013 and also included mandatory cuts to the federal budget deficit. Since then, the extension has been increased twice by a total of $900 billion.
The debt limit currently stands at $15.194 trillion and would increase to $16.394 trillion with the request.

China has a key role in the 122-nation alliance that has banded together to take down the Powers that Were.
Such an event seems imminent enough now that on December 31st, there was a mainstream media article that seemed to be getting people ready for it.
The ‘spin’ here is that it would be a terrible thing if this were to happen — akin to an invasion while America is at its weakest moment.
2012 Voters Feel Dispirited
Republicans or Democrats, liberal or conservative, young or old, they lack confidence – in the country’s potential to be great again, in their elected leaders’ ability to do the right thing, in the economy and in themselves.
It’s not that they feel incapable of doing what needs to be done, as much as they are uncertain about what that right thing is and whether anything they can do will have any real impact….
In Lima, Ohio, where people have seen America’s industrial might falter: “I’m just waiting for China or somebody to take us over. That’s the way it seems,” says Becky Jamison, 36, who has watched her 18-year-old son look unsuccessfully for work for months. “Because we’re just falling apart.”

By now, the public is realizing that war is big business. It’s all about money, power and control. 9/11 was immediately turned into an excuse to invade Iraq. As soon as US forces got there, it was all about the oil.
All Wars are Fought Over Natural Resources
Wars for Oil
Skipping over a long history of U.S. imperialist aggression against other countries, we may note that the U.S. did not go to war in the Persian Gulf in 1991 to liberate Kuwait from Iraqi aggression (to which its ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had given a green light) but rather to move military forces into the area and to establish military bases so as to exercise greater control over the area’s oil.
Talk of removing “that evil dictator Saddam Hussein” is simple obfuscation.
Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are lying to the American people when they pretend to be outraged at the actions of the Iraqi dictator (whom the U.S. supported right up until 1991, including Saddam’s use of chemical weapons against the Kurds).
In fact it is control of Middle Eastern oil which is the primary motivation for U.S. military plans for that area.
The Federal Reserve has been lending money to foreign banks for a lot longer than you might think.
You may also be surprised who they were lending to — but then again, after all you’ve read, maybe you’re starting to get the point. This is another excerpt from Still’s book, New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies.
150: Less than four years after its passage in 1913, with World War I in progress, the Federal Reserve loaned American dollars to the Soviet Communists immediately following the Russian revolution. As we will see, a similar injunction of American cash occurred less than thirty years later during the next World War.
On June 15, 1933, Congressman McFadden explained to Congress what the Federal Reserve, along with the Rockefellers’ Chase Bank (soon to merge with the Warburg’s Manhattan Bank to form Chase-Manhattan Bank), had done on behalf of the fledgling Communist government.
The Soviet Government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank acting through the Chase Bank… you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States Treasury for the benefit of Russia. [23]
[23. Daniel Plemmons, The Illuminati, (self-published tract, 1979), p. 28-29.]
Another extremely vital “leak” of information that came to my attention during this investigation is from Susan Lindauer, who worked for the CIA in the lead-up to 9/11.
Lindauer wasn’t just any CIA employee. She was the chief liaison between Iraq and the Bush Administration.
What she reveals in this videotaped testimony is astonishing. The Iraqis wanted peace, and were willing to do anything, trade anything, give up anything to get it. They were flatly refused.
Furthermore, she reveals that she was warned not to go to New York in the weeks leading up to 9/11. She was told that miniature nuclear devices were going to be used and there would be radioactive fallout.
By blowing the whistle and revealing that there was prior knowledge of 9/11 at the highest levels, she suffered a prolonged imprisonment — but was ultimately freed.
She also asserts that the pilot who shot down Flight 93 over Shanskville, Pennsylvania is still incarcerated, and is being drugged into a “chemical straight jacket.”
CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Blows the Whistle 10 Years Post-911
The greatest victory of the Federal Reserve cabal has been the ability to print money out of thin air.
This did not come easily. In order to accomplish this, it was first necessary to systematically confiscate all the world’s gold.
This secret Western plan for a worldwide “magic printing press” began in 1776 with the publication of Adam Smith’s “An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” — or “The Wealth of Nations” for short.
This meticulously researched 786-page monster document formed the intellectual, philosophical and economic argument behind the creation of the current “free market” global financial system.
It also helped to establish the criteria and reasoning for creating the secret, “off-market” central-bank trading platforms that were backed by all the hidden, stolen gold, beginning in 1944. [I will explain how these platforms work as we go on.]
Several university websites offer a PDF version of this document for download. Here is Penn State’s version:
Though at its core, Smith’s masterwork had positive ideals, intended to create a better world for everyone, most nations of the world now feel Smith’s vision has been wildly distorted and misused within the current economic system.
Many strategies are secretly being used to combat this global crisis — including the trillion-dollar lawsuit mentioned in Part One.
This entire “Illuminati” financial system is finally breaking open and becoming public — for the first time since its inception. Much of what I am writing here has never before been available — except to a very select few on Earth.
Most scholars focus on Smith’s defense of “free market” economics. Smith argued that government tariffs and oversight will restrict economic growth. Politicians can be bought off and manipulated by big corporations, keeping prices high and quality low.
However, without government restrictions, the people will democratically “vote with their wallets” for whatever is best — and in a truly fair and open game, they will ultimately get better products at better prices.
What we are most concerned with is the argument that inevitably arises from studying Smith’s work: namely that no country could legitimately remain on a gold standard if we wanted world peace.
Even if a world leader of typical intelligence could only make it through the first 44 pages of this book, he or she would already have a strong sense of inevitability regarding Smith’s ultimate position on gold. Here are four of the most prominent examples:
First of all, if a country only has a certain, fixed amount of gold, massive inflation is inevitable. More people will be born and they will produce more stuff. That, in turn, forces you to print more money — but you don’t have more gold.
The more money you print, the less gold anyone can actually get for it. This makes their money worth less and less over time. Everyone who has paper money in the bank or stashed in their closet will find it continually decreasing in purchasing power.
This problem would inevitably cause suffering, riots and ultimately mass casualties as the public realizes their money is worthless, and / or other nations refuse to honor their currency — thereby choking them off from needed survival supplies.
Second of all, what if someone within the country feels they either own the gold or could successfully steal it — including the ruling party or some of their minions?
This individual or group — which may just be a warring, pissed-off faction within the overall power structure — could mount a sting operation, take the gold out of the country, bring it somewhere else and then defend their actions with military force.
How hard is it, really, to transport a few thousand tons of this shiny, yellow metal? How many soldiers and guards do you need to kill, in the middle of the night, as your teams swoop in and move it out — in massive shipments?
Thanks to the invention of the wheel, and the inevitable availability of large groups of mercenaries to do the work, you just send in a bunch of guys and haul it the hell out of there. With enough planning and logistics, it could all happen in one night.
By simply moving the gold from one nation to another, by whatever violent means were required, someone could instantly and completely destroy the nation they took the gold from.
Thirdly, if one country has gold reserves and others do not, they become a target for invasion.
Natural human greed and violence would inevitably doom the people in that country to invasion by others wishing to steal it.
The only way to solve that problem is to insure that no one nation has gold-backed currency.
That way the game is fair for everyone… all across the board.
Lastly, any country who does have a gold-backed currency will have an unfair advantage over other nations.
The people of the world will naturally want to invest in a gold-backed currency over any “worthless paper” counterpart.
Therefore, the powerful will only get more powerful, while the weak become systematically weaker.
The “Golden Rule” is “He who has the gold… makes the rules.”
The leaders of the world were told that eliminating gold-backed currency was the only solution to this problem. Then, money could be issued via fiat.
Though the term “fiat” is akin to saying “the Devil’s Pitchfork” to anyone who reads this sort of material, the original idea behind fiat currency was simply that it would be backed by the wealth created by the people.
Adam Smith made this point right from the beginning in The Wealth of Nations — as we can see here in a quote from page 31.
“It was not by gold or by silver, but by labour, that all the wealth of the world was originally purchased; and its value, to those who possess it, and who want to exchange it for some new productions, is precisely equal to the quantity of labour which it can enable them to purchase or command.”
In its ideal form, a nation calculates the actual amount of wealth created by a given nation, and then issues currency in proportion to that equity. With the Internet, this could be openly calculated and audited by the public with complete transparency.
In this setting, no economic collapse ever needs to happen again — and the more motivated a country is to produce wealth, the more wealth it can generate for itself. This, according to Smith’s vision, could not be accomplished with the gold standard.
According to Benjamin Fulford, the former Asia-Pacific bureau chief for Forbes Magazine who I interviewed for Part One, fully eighty-five percent of the world’s gold ended up in Asia.
This was due to the mass exporting of fine products that were paid for in gold — by the likes of the Roman Empire and later the Spanish Empire. These empires bought fine silks, elaborate vases, gorgeous china, exotic spices and plenty of opium — and paid for it in gold.
They, in turn, had acquired this gold by various means — including robbing and plundering every nation they could manage to conquer.
For this same reason, by the 1700s it was well understood that in order to create a worldwide fiat currency, Asia was the prime target to invade and plunder. The gold had to be withdrawn and hidden away in order to create this new economic system.
The British Empire, secretly headed by the Rothschild clan, saw Japan as the best option to mount this offensive. It was a medieval country, with very little technology, but a huge population center.
Two southern clans were outfitted by the British with modern weapons, and they quickly subdued the rest of the country. This led to the “Meiji Restoration” of 1868, in which young Japanese people were put in power.
The term “Meiji” means “Enlightened Rule”, and as I said in my original article where I interviewed Fulford about this story, the term is therefore interchangeable with the Western “Illuminati”.
It took time and effort to build Japan up to be a sufficiently powerful entity to invade and plunder China.
Japan was very active in World War One. Great atrocities occurred on an absolutely unprecedented scale, but the situation in the world was no different afterwards. The same tensions still existed and no conflicts had been truly resolved.
The Federal Reserve began on December 23, 1913. The first major spark to begin World War I occurred the following June, when Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the Austria-Hungary throne, was assassinated — along with his wife.
The assassination was by a nationalistic member of a different country — Serbia. Germany sided with Austria and Hungary and declared war on Serbia and their ally, Russia. Germany’s declaration of war was on August 1, 1914 — and very soon afterwards, it began spiraling out of control.
Germany invaded Luxembourg, declared war on France and invaded Belgium to have an attack point against France. Britain declared war on Germany in defense, and Canada joined the fight.
This all occurred in 1914, and the battle raged on until 1919 — with several other countries getting drawn in along the way.
By 1921, it was clear that nothing had really changed in the world. This degree of atrocity was sufficient to convince Emperor Hirohito of Japan to travel to the United Kingdom and sign a secret pact to create the Bank of International Settlements.
This was the equivalent of the Federal Reserve, only intended to expand into a truly global reach.
The plan Hirohito accepted was also secretly agreed to by many other nations in the world. Whether voluntarily or involuntarily, all the most significant supplies of gold and silver were turned over to the Federal Reserve and Bank of International Settlements and “blacklisted” — that is, put off-market.

When I first interviewed Benjamin Fulford and started hearing about this, I had no other information. I gained much more insight when I was contacted by the two main people involved in the lawsuit — Neil Keenan and Keith Scott.
After this interview was largely complete — and we will see the results below — I found additional corroborating evidence from former City of London banker David Guyatt.
Former City of London banker David Guyatt stumbled into a world of intrigue and danger — including threats to his own life — as he found out what lay beneath the visible plans of the Federal Reserve.
He released his first incredibly detailed book exposing these plots in 2000. By 2002, his knowledge base had considerably grown — and his article “The Spoils of War,” he revealed firsthand knowledge of the group behind the Federal Reserve, and their plans:
The story about what really happened to the loot plundered by the Nazis and Japanese during WWII remains one of the best-kept secrets of the last fifty years. Few outside of the charmed circle of initiated insiders possess any knowledge whatsoever of the true dimensions of what can be described as the biggest cover-up of all time….By putting the spotlight on Nazi plunder from the very beginning, public attention was diverted away from the industrial scale looting undertaken by Japan’s special plunder teams known as the “Golden Lily.” And it is here that the real story dwells….
Prince Chichibu was the younger brother of Japan’s Emperor Hirohito, and had been named by the Emperor to head the ultra-secret Golden Lily – a secretive group tasked with looting China of its wealth – both government and privately owned hard assets.
Beginning in 1937, with the Rape of Nanking, the plunder teams set to work with a vengeance.
The spoils were far larger than had been imagined. It is believed that 6,000 metric tonnes of gold, plus a bounty of silver and precious gemstones, fell in to the hands of Japan’s imperial treasury as a consequence. [2]
The phenomenal wealth of East and Southeast Asia had accrued over thousands of years — and Japan wanted it all. Over the next seven years the Orient was wrung dry of its precious metals, solid gold religious artefacts and an unbelievable quantity of gemstones.
Most of this was shipped by the Japanese to the Philippines as a collecting point, for onward shipment to Tokyo. However, by 1943 the sea-lanes had been cut by US submarines and the decision was taken to bury the plunder throughout the Philippines….
The quantity of gold and other treasures buried was phenomenal. Japanese cartographers made maps of each site and trusted accountants marked them with three digits signifying the Yen values of the gold, diamonds and other assets buried in each.
A site bearing the designation “777” was valued at 777 billion yen. With 1945 exchange rates fluctuating between 3.50 and 4.00 yen to the dollar, just one triple seven site was worth almost US$200 billion – a king’s ransom by any measure. There were many triple seven (“777”) sites as well as triple nine and lesser sites.
Not only were these figures based on 1945 values — when a dollar was really a dollar – but also when the price of gold was $35.00 an ounce. Today the price of gold is closer to $300 an ounce. But add to this the fact that in the Philippines alone there were over 170 burial sites, and a picture forms of a wealth so unimaginable that it almost defies belief. [4]
With the defeat of Japanese forces in the Philippines in 1945, a project of the utmost secrecy was launched to recover the buried Golden Lily plunder. This project was placed under the day-to-day control of Captain Edward Lansdale and OSS operative Severino Garcia Santa Romana… The CIA would later recruit both officers.
Over the next few years numerous plunder sites were located and the stolen assets recovered. The gold, gemstones and other treasure were deposited in over 170 bank accounts spread across more than forty countries – all of whom were signatories of the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement. Collectively, the recovered loot came to be known as the Black Eagle Trust or fund.
Even to this day the mere mention of the Black Eagle Fund causes unease, and the entire subject remains cloaked in official secrecy.
For example, during a 1999 discussion on this subject, one highly placed banker familiar with the existence and arrangements of this slush fund cautioned: “if you wish to discuss certain aspects of military program finance on the internet, you may be doing so in contravention of several statutes and regulations, both in the United States and in any NATO-member jurisdiction.”….
According to official figures, the present volume of above ground gold stocks is approximately 142,000 metric tonnes.  This, it is claimed, accounts for all the gold mined over six thousand years. [5]  In contrast to these figures, just one of the many “777” Golden Lily sites would have held, using a conservative estimate, upwards of 90,000 metric tonnes. [6]….
…the last word about the involvement of the Trilateral Commission in plundered gold comes from Mr. Goldfinger himself – Severino Garcia Santa Romana. Prior to his death in 1974, Sta. Romana told his wife that he was a senior member (indeed, he claimed to be the head) of the Trilateral Commission — that he said “controlled world finance.”
He also revealed he was deeply involved with a secret society known as the “Illuminati” which he maintained had set in motion a fifty year plan to “corner the major part of the worlds gold supply.” [41]
It is, of course, impossible to verify this claim.
But it can be no more an outrageous idea than that propounded by Cecil Rhodes for his secret society… The [British] Minister of Economic Warfare… Lord Selborne… was a member of the top level “circle of initiates” of the secret society formed by South African gold and diamond magnate, Cecil Rhodes – who founded De Beers….
For [these “Illuminati” plans] to succeed, Rhodes wrote in 1891, to his friend W T Stead, would require “…gradually absorbing the wealth of the world…” [42]  Controlling the world’s supply of gold, platinum and diamonds would undoubtedly be one way of achieving this ambition.
According to Fulford, over 60 percent of the US military in the Pentagon now supports the overthrow of this cabal. The logistics of actually accomplishing this feat are staggering to comprehend.
It appears that we will soon see mass arrests of many key conspirators in this problem by the Pentagon.
This will create an unprecedented housecleaning of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the US government, as well as large corporations, the finance industry, the military and the mainstream media complex — which is largely dominated by a handful of corporations.
I fully understand how terrifying this will be to most people — and there will be incredibly powerful disinformation suggesting it will be a “New World Order takeover” once it happens.

I wanted to get at least part of this investigation posted at the beginning of the weekend. I will not say when the rest is going up, except that in my ideal framework it will be some time this weekend.
This final section will feature the full transcript of interviews with Neil Keenan and Keith Scott — and re-iterate most of what we discussed about this groundbreaking lawsuit.
This investigation you are now reading will therefore be undergoing dynamic updates throughout the weekend. For that same reason, keep checking back and keep reloading every 10 minutes or so as you read, as the changes are likely to be small, but ongoing.
I will notify you once the piece is finished and the dynamic updates stop. At that point — and not before then — you can mirror this investigation far and wide.
I thank you for your continuing support.

d Wilcock 12 Dec 2011 Hits:662918 David’s Blog

New Video: Occupy Your Self! P…

New Video: Occupy Your Self! Personal Spiritual Development  In this new video, David Wilcock explores the core spiritual teachings of the Law of One series and other great sources to give you practical tools that can help you…

David Wilcock - avatar David Wilcock 24 Nov 2011 Hits:87218 David’s Blog

Read more

  • New Fulford Interview Transcri…

    On October 13, 2011, Benjamin Fulford gave another revealing interview. As a public service, we have transcribed it and summarized the greater context we have been sharing here — so…

  • See David in Manhattan This We…

    See David give a free lecture, and appear in two free panel discussions, at the massive New Life Expo this weekend — truly the most epic gathering of its kind…

  • Disclosure Imminent? Part II: …

    MANY underground bases have now been completely cleared out… materials, equipment, and personnel… by yet-unknown forces. An international coalition, intending to overthrow the Old World Order and free humanity from enslavement,…

  • Disclosure Imminent? Two Under…

    80 different countries have now formed an alliance against the Old World Order / Nazi-esque cabal.   Two huge underground cities were destroyed on August 23rd — which may be seen by…

  • Disclosure Breakthrough: Sourc…

    Download a great new hour-long commercial-free radio show and read the official announcement: Thanks to your support, we debuted halfway up the New York Times Bestseller List at #18! [UPDATED…

  • Incredible Source Field Slides…

    “What the Government Does Not Want You to Know About UFOs” has now been officially launched on Huffington Post — a stunning, sexy overview of information in David’s new book,…

  • The Source Field Investigation…

    Watch our spectacular new two-hour documentary film revealing many secrets in The Source Field Investigations, David’s epic new book set to release August 23rd! You’ve waited long enough — now…

  • 1950s Human ETs Prepare Us for…

    Human ETs visited Earth in the 1950s and told us Ascension would be attainable in the near future, thanks to a natural cycle. Stunning new videos and documents have emerged…

  • See David in Holland Saturday,…

    David will be speaking at the Mirror Centre in Amsterdam next Saturday, July 2nd — so don’t miss it! BIG NEW ARTICLE ON THE WAY I’m here in the UK for the…

  • Media Disinformation About Dis…

    “The Event” ended with a blatant attempt to scare you into thinking Ascension will be a catastrophe that kills everyone except ETs. This is actually a good sign, as it…

Prev Next

facebook Fanpage



David Wilcock


david_wilcock FINANCIAL TYRANNY: Defeating the Greatest Cover-Up of All Time 11 hours ago · reply · retweet · favorite

david_wilcock The Trillion-Dollar Lawsuit That Could End Financial Tyranny, Part II: History Lesson 26 days ago · reply · retweet · favorite

david_wilcock CONFIRMED: The Trillion-Dollar Lawsuit That Could End Finanical Tyranny 32 days ago · reply · retweet · favorite

david_wilcock Occupy Your Self! Personal Spiritual Development 50 days ago · reply · retweet · favorite

Huffington Post